@Sunny said:
Looking at the application information/process on the wiki, I feel like I'm looking at a mush from the 90s (and not in a good way, these practices died for a reason). And yet, still mulling it over.
I'll admit I haven't kept current with whatever 'current practices' are in terms of application processing. Our app process is one part working with what I'm familiar with having played NYC/Metro recently, but I got my start in the 90s so there's probably some Old Skool roots there, yeah. It's mostly a matter of what I and the other staff that started the site up with me need, as storytellers and admins, to determine if a character is a good fit and to find hooks to work with.
To my mind, though, the 1990s style app process was 'write a novella' rather than 'answer 10-15 questions about your character and show me a sheet.'
I do have a question, though -- the application process looks really rough, but there's the impression that things are quite dangerous and characters might die. An extensive application process coupled with a dangerous IC environment isn't a recipe for success.
I mean, it's WoD, of course a character /might/ die. If I understand you correctly, you're basically asking about the risk vs investment balance. The danger a character faces is a function of their actions. If you want to play a character that lays low, doesn't make waves, and withdraws from threats rather than confronting them your character can be very, very safe. If that's your style of character, though, I would suggest that they probably wouldn't go near Detroit in the first place, in our setting.
That said, I've been running tabletop games for 20+ years and this isn't my first time to the MU* staffing rodeo, either. In my career as GM/DM/ST I've presided over five character deaths. I think I know a thing or two about balancing setting with story. The goal is also that the extreme 'we're fighting uphill' tilt of our setting is a surmountable thing, meant to be fixed by player actions. I recommend characters who are here with full knowledge that they're the underdogs, and who are looking to fight smart to make a difference.
I'm also curious what part of the app process you object to, in particular, so that I can review. Feedback is always a welcome thing.