Nov 27, 2020, 6:07 PM

@faraday No I'm just tired and theorizing.

It sounds feasible to only apply IPv6 to internal devices and then use NAT to route to them? I dunno. I'm tired and possibly over complicating things.

The router itself would have an external IP address as the focal point of connections exiting the network. Each device on the network typically would have a device on it assigned one of the typical internal IP addresses 192.168.x.x, but I was trying to brainstorm why a connection would believe it didnt have an ipv4 address and here is where my brain went...

  • Router has ipv4 address
  • Router assigns device an IPv6 address
  • NAT at the firewall level could be failing to route return packets to the device?

I dunno. Like I said I'm tired and was wondering why a device wouldn't have any sort of ipv4 recognized address (if even to route to) because a hard locked IPv6 config seems like a nightmare. There are typical simple home networking configs, then there are "dickin around with the network" configs.