I know it's an old topic but to this day....

[Ganymede]

@Bananerz said in I know it's an old topic but to this day....:

Arguing about what is real when you're in a simulation.

Arguing about what is love when you don't want to be hurt no more.

[Killer Klown]

@Ganymede said in I know it's an old topic but to this day....:

@Bananerz said in I know it's an old topic but to this day....:

Arguing about what is real when you're in a simulation.

Arguing about what is love when you don't want to be hurt no more.

Arguing about the justice system when you've just admitted to murder.

[Ganymede]

@Killer-Klown said in I know it's an old topic but to this day....:

@Ganymede said in I know it's an old topic but to this day....:

@Bananerz said in I know it's an old topic but to this day....:

Arguing about what is real when you're in a simulation.

Arguing about what is love when you don't want to be hurt no more.

Arguing about the justice system when you've just admitted to murder.

Arguing about sui generis when you've appealed a decision you stipulated to.

[Ominous]

@Ganymede I am curious. Then again, I am a weirdo who reads court decisions for fun.

[Ganymede]

@Ominous

In brief:

Sui generis in American jurisprudence is a term of art used to identify a group of classification that arises independent of others due to its special characteristics. In application, it refers to the power of a particular entity that is unique to its nature; for example, a court's contempt power. When raised in a legal argument, you are suggesting that a particular case either is inapplicable because it should be confined to its own facts or because the instant case must be confined to its own facts. When raise by someone pro se, it means you're a fucking moron.