@tinuviel Uh, no. That is a complete mischaracterization, with a fair bit of role-reversal at play. I said this:
@surreality said in RL Anger:
@tinuviel We're just going to have to disagree about the terrible part.
@tinuviel said in RL Anger:
@surreality Well yes, given that those terms are subjective. And you're wrong.
@surreality said in RL Anger:
@tinuviel I'm wrong a lot, but as somebody who has been suicidal for over a year, that show helped chill me out quite a fucking lot on that front, as that result is anything but terrible so far as I'm concerned, and I'm sure as shit not wrong to feel that way. So, bluntly, fuck you.
Your snark routine is uncute and grossly misplaced in this case.
@tinuviel said in RL Anger:
@surreality It's not a snark routine. That you find it helpful is great. That so many find it unhelpful to the point of actually causing problems is not great.
Given that not one but two rapes of young girls occurs, and a scene of actual suicide appears on screen (except in Australia) is evidence enough for me that it is not great.
It's fine for you, well done. It's not fine for everyone.
@surreality said in RL Anger:
@tinuviel Bluntly: I disagree with your opinion that it's terrible. You can tell me I'm wrong for having a different opinion all you want, obviously, but it's just making you an asshole in this case.
You were telling me I was wrong for having a different opinion, after peaceably saying we'll just have to disagree about it -- which you could have simply left be, but you didn't; my reasoning didn't matter for shit, I was simply wrong for having a different view than you.
I told you why I had a different opinion. A very personal why, at that. And you kept on banging on about how I'm wrong for having a different opinion about it, despite it being one of the reasons I'm still here to type shit in the first place.
You seriously don't think that's gonna get a 'fuck you, pal'? Really?