Apr 26, 2016, 2:39 PM

@Ganymede said in RL Anger:

@Derp

That's good. There's hope.

This taps into a peeve of mine: a large one. It goes to the whole "zealously advocating" thing. Many attorneys seem to think this means that you have to roadblock everything I try to do, or attempt to convince me of the merits and strengths of their clients' cases.

The thing is, if I'm looking to settle a case, I don't give a shit what you think of the merits and strengths. I am clearly trying to figure out a cost-effective way of resolving our clients' interests. This can be done if the other attorney isn't a fucking moron, but many of them seem entrenched in the idea that making my life difficult will make me want to settle things faster. This is not at all true, as I am backed, most of the time, by an insurance company.

I pretty much have unlimited resources and funds to tap into. If you want to play the game like that, fine. But realize that your client probably wants money as soon as possible, and to move on with their lives, you prick. And I'm willing to do that, if you just fucking cooperate with my requests for information. I haven't lost a motion to compel in my entire career because I only ask for shit that I know I am entitled to through the discovery process.

Just give me the damned documents.

Yeah, no. I mean, that's not even my area, really. I'm more the guy that does the groaning facepalm at cases like Wickard v. Filburn and the overzealous use of the Everything Clause when it comes to rights and such, or the guy shaking his head that Obergefell wasn't decided as a gender discrimination case. That's more my area of 'up in arms zealotry'. If there's an offer to settle on the table, I'll present it to a client and maybe pressure him to take it, if it's decent. Because seriously, everyone wins and it doesn't have to get that messy.

So I feel your pain there. But rest assured, my idealism is confined to other things than making your life miserable.