Nov 28, 2017, 11:44 PM

@thenomain said in Regarding administration on MSB:

@bored said in Regarding administration on MSB:

@thenomain I mean, damaging only on the scale of any of this shit being anything which anyone takes remotely seriously, which is a... very low scale, yes.

And yet, here we are.

if we're going to have 'active mods' (which I categorically object to as a major and harmful shift in the board culture) they need to post better than 'useless at best.'

So your summary of Auspice is 'useless at best'. Which means that you think her average is 'below useless', with no more evidence than "it looks bad if you don't trust them to begin with".

No, sorry. My 'useless at best' is for the quality of that post alone. IE you can scale it from 'not harmful but literally accomplishes nothing because the people who are accusing these things won't read it or care' (ie, useless) to 'maybe slightly harmful because its an official post that looks like spin/denial, and... I dunno, maybe someone who didn't know about MSB could get pointed at it by an angry staffer and believe them' (ie, fractionally negative).

Overall, I think we have two examples of @Auspice modding poorly. Based on this, if they want active mods, I think she's a bad choice so far. But I don't actually want active mods, and as a purely mechanical/workload mod I would have no particular issue.