When someone tells you to stop continuing a conversation through DMs, you stop sending them. When you continue to send them, you are breaking a fundamental rule here. When that is brought to my attention, I will take action. And as stated when I banned Rinel permanently, I am not the sort to levy temporary measures.
For these reasons, farfalla has been banned.
@ganymede Are you for real? Do you mean the DMs that other user instigated, the conversation they started, and that they returned to several times, hours later, after the conversation had ended? Are you absolutely serious right now?
Like, holy shit, did you even look at the conversation wherein the other party was continually extending the conversation?
Kanye Qwest Banned last edited by
BRING BACK DOWNVOTES
Farfalla blocked her when she said to stop messaging her.
I did look at the conversation, yes.
I saw the message wherein farfalla was asked to stop.
There were messages after that.
This is not up for discussion here.
saosmash last edited by
I appreciate the importance of a bright line rule, but for the reasons Roz cites, reconsideration in this case is warranted. Noncontact is traditionally interpreted as a shield, not a sword, and is being used otherwise here.
With that said, ultimately moot, because if I were farfalla I wouldn't be coming back here after this either way.
And I probably won't be either.
Tinuviel last edited by
If what @Roz says is true, then both participants should be punished.
You're swiftly degrading any remaining confidence we have in you.
thesuntsar Banned last edited by
So for the record, baiting and engaging in conversations with a poster over controversial issues while they're upset and you're an admin? A-okay here.
Getting into one brief scuffle with another person one time and then both people going to their corners? Nuke an otherwise peaceful poster from orbit.
I understand your perspective. I know you understand how consent works.
But, as I said, I reviewed the conversation and made my decision based on the same.
Tez last edited by
Your decision sucks. Post the logs.
krmbm Banned last edited by
@ganymede you are acting really weird.
This is absolutely beyond the pale. I know what that conversation contained. You are angry at Farfalla for being one of the people to post unhappily about administrative choices and you are absolutely using this as retaliation. I am honestly shocked that you would engage in this level of unethical fashion.
Meg last edited by
OK, back just to get a post in b4 I am retroactively banned for necro'ing posts.
I read the conversation. I saw the message specifically requesting that the conversation end. It did not.
It seems common sense to me that two parties can enter an engagement consensually or tolerably, but when one party elects to end it, that's the end of it.
And yet here is a log that I looked at twice now, and it is clear to me what happened.
I said this was not up for discussion. I meant it.