May 5, 2022, 2:01 AM
Your decision sucks. Post the logs.
farfalla banned
-
When someone tells you to stop continuing a conversation through DMs, you stop sending them. When you continue to send them, you are breaking a fundamental rule here. When that is brought to my attention, I will take action. And as stated when I banned Rinel permanently, I am not the sort to levy temporary measures.
For these reasons, farfalla has been banned.
“It is better to live doing the things that you like. It is foolish to live within this dream of a world seeing unpleasantness and doing only things that you do not like.” -- Yamamoto Tsunetomo.
-
@ganymede Are you for real? Do you mean the DMs that other user instigated, the conversation they started, and that they returned to several times, hours later, after the conversation had ended? Are you absolutely serious right now?
-
Like, holy shit, did you even look at the conversation wherein the other party was continually extending the conversation?
-
@ganymede
BRING BACK DOWNVOTES -
Farfalla blocked her when she said to stop messaging her.
-
I did look at the conversation, yes.
I saw the message wherein farfalla was asked to stop.
There were messages after that.
This is not up for discussion here.
-
I appreciate the importance of a bright line rule, but for the reasons Roz cites, reconsideration in this case is warranted. Noncontact is traditionally interpreted as a shield, not a sword, and is being used otherwise here.
With that said, ultimately moot, because if I were farfalla I wouldn't be coming back here after this either way.
And I probably won't be either.
-
If what @Roz says is true, then both participants should be punished.
You're swiftly degrading any remaining confidence we have in you.
-
So for the record, baiting and engaging in conversations with a poster over controversial issues while they're upset and you're an admin? A-okay here.
Getting into one brief scuffle with another person one time and then both people going to their corners? Nuke an otherwise peaceful poster from orbit.
Got it.
-
I understand your perspective. I know you understand how consent works.
But, as I said, I reviewed the conversation and made my decision based on the same.
“It is better to live doing the things that you like. It is foolish to live within this dream of a world seeing unpleasantness and doing only things that you do not like.” -- Yamamoto Tsunetomo.
-
Your decision sucks. Post the logs.
-
@ganymede you are acting really weird.
-
This is absolutely beyond the pale. I know what that conversation contained. You are angry at Farfalla for being one of the people to post unhappily about administrative choices and you are absolutely using this as retaliation. I am honestly shocked that you would engage in this level of unethical fashion.
-
OK, back just to get a post in b4 I am retroactively banned for necro'ing posts.
-
@tez said in farfalla banned:
Your decision sucks. Post the logs.
decisions*
Post the logs, bring back downvotes, remove Derp as admin.
-
I read the conversation. I saw the message specifically requesting that the conversation end. It did not.
It seems common sense to me that two parties can enter an engagement consensually or tolerably, but when one party elects to end it, that's the end of it.
And yet here is a log that I looked at twice now, and it is clear to me what happened.
I said this was not up for discussion. I meant it.
-
Locked by
Ganymede May 5, 2022, 2:06 AM