@Thenomain said in RL things I love:
I'm not disagreeing with anyone about what they believe the bull means. It's part of my dilemma. The man who created it was pulling from historical sources, out of his own pocket, to honor his adopted nation, I don't believe that anything he did was demeaning to women, so when someone is paid to say that he is, he has every right to be upset. He is essentially being given the middle finger other people co-opting his work. He wasn't even given a chance to clarify before this.
I truly believe that an artist has the right and sometimes the obligation to defend their thesis. Almost every art school drills this into them.
This is why I've been bringing it up when people go into the whole 'the bull is a male banker symbol!' thing. A lot of people had never even heard of it before marketers and bankers paid to put 'Fearless Girl' there. And a lot of those who did didn't give two shits before that. I feel really bad for that artist.
He put his personal time, effort, and money into it. Gender was not a facet of the art when he made it (yes, bulls are male, but wasn't one of the 'points' he was trying to make). His work was coopted for something else. And yes, art is in the viewer's eyes, but it has been just utterly warped into a wholly different message and in a very scummy way, IMO.