@kestrel said in Real World Peeves, Disgruntlement, and Irks.:
Anarchism is when power is equally distributed through direct democracy, and the protection of all individual rights that don't impose upon other people's individual rights.
And this is the issue that I have with this definition; that and up there, which I have bolded, is joining two things in fundamental opposition. Democracy, or really any sort of governance, is still a means by which you restrain the actions and situations of others. It always has been. It always will be. There is absolutely no exercise of power over another that does not, in some way, constrain them, and thus violates their individual rights to self-determination.
The flaws in democracy have been apparent since the first one was thought up. Plato wrote about it. Aristotle wrote about it. Extensively. It always, always leads to power creep and oppressive tactics. It's just inherent in the nature of the system.
The definition above sounds wonderful on paper, but is fundamentally contradictory in actual practice.