@groth said in The Work Thread:
I think being assigned tasks outside of your job description solely based on your gender is discrimination.
I agree, but what I read was that such tasks fell to her because her boss didn't do what he was supposed to do. Still, yours is a fair reading in context.
I have read articles similar to the ones you posted. I understand what is being said. In many ways, my suggestions follow; in others, they don't. Norm criticism is no different than what I would call "regularly checking in with people" or "keeping my eyes and ears open." And master suppression techniques are what I consider "being a fucking asshole."
I suppose I see things differently than most because, in my office, every member of support staff is a woman. On top of that, half of the attorneys and partners are women. And you still see the regular hierarchical shit happen because, well, some people are just shitty leaders no matter their gender.
I think I'm a pretty good boss to work with. Staff have told me this; but am I really? I mean, I do shit no other partner does, like: (1) upload my own e-mails into our online cloud storage system; (2) print out my own e-mails; (3) input all of my hours; (4) field cold calls and referrals; (5) spend more than five minutes every day with the associates to train them and make them feel comfortable; (6) get my own coffee; (7) make coffee for the firm; (8) handle my own discovery requests and responses; (9) file my own briefs, motions, and notices when I can; and (10) create my own notebooks for hearings and trials. And I do all this because, in my vision of how to practice law, this is shit that lawyers ought to be doing on their own.
But my administrative assistant always seems like she's walking on egg-shells. It's probably because people who are so damned independent in the workplace might not need you in the future. Maybe she's worried about job security. Maybe she's worried she's screwed up. One time, we missed a brief deadline: we got a continuance filed, and everything was okay. But she was near-tears because she felt like she fucked up. And she went to one of the senior assistants and asked if I was pissed, and was told: no, that's just Ganymede, you're fine, and they'd tell you to your face if you fucked up.
Like, I don't know how I'm doing. I don't. But I hope that showing that I want to be part of the workplace and I don't mind doing things they do or I don't expect you to make coffee and get me a cup if I come to work before you do, and all of that. Leadership's a tricky thing, I think, and what matters is the effort.
But what happened to Juniper is straight-up bullshit.
I just won an award (thank you) for my extensive pro bono work, so I decided to hold a firm event for it. I got the food; I helped set up; I helped clean up; I helped put all the food away; and I did it because it was my party and I felt responsible for it. And I think that's a feeling that's sorely missed in Juniper's boss, and in a lot of leadership positions in a lot of workplaces.