@Roz
Apologies on the misattribution, and thank you for pointing that out to me. I'm not familiar with most writers/artists, and there's no gender pronouns in the topmost part of the article where she's noted.
I was skimming the prior paragraph leading up to the larger quote and juxtaposed G. Willow Wilson and Daniel Ketchum where it's talking about bringing Bennet on board, and uses the gender pronoun 'he'. The larger quote I used is also from Bennet (also a woman), not Wilson either, so apparently Soapbox isn't the only community whose names I keep swapping around.
That said, I stand by my sarcasm. If anything, that makes it worse. A world where the women hold the same disproportionate degree of authority in their society as men do in ours, but totally not for the same reasons, because god forbid.
My housemate said, when I showed her the quote, "A 'feminist utopia' would be one where everyone was equal, not one where 'women are in charge instead of men'."
That said, having had a while to think about it, it's possible it's just a really shitty description. A lot of leadership and authority, especially in fiction, tends to involve coincidence and opportunity as much as anything else. If it's a world where everyone is treated equally and not held back or pushed forward by their gender, then there's a certain probability that in a society that's split 50/50 by gender (please no spiral into gender fluidity/spectrum here) women would have been at the right place and the right time to take advantage of those opportunities. Like flipping heads a bunch of times instead of tails.
Blah blah blah, overthinking it. Which I wouldn't be doing if there hadn't been the prefacing line of "I really didn't want to have some kind of validating reason.", and she just hadn't come up with a poorly stated validating reason immediately afterwards.
Before anybody gets all their feathers ruffled, I've got zero problem with a world (comics or otherwise) where women are predominantly in charge. If that entire quote had just said "We didn't really want to have some kind of validating reason, so that's just the way it is. In our world, the people in charge just happen to be mostly women." I wouldn't have batted an eyelash. It's certainly a far more plausible idea for a world than a lot of the other patchwork stuff.
tl;dr As usual I'm just irritated by what are probably largely meaningless semantics in a throwaway comment. Also apparently terrible at putting the right name to the right post. I almost directed this one at @Arkandel instead of @Roz again.