@secretfire I appreciate you illustrating the favoritism and absurdity involved in the previous game. It was indeed just that dumb. The fact that your "level 5" character was so involved and invested with every major NPC in the game says quite a bit.
However, if you expect anyone to believe your tiny little "level 5" survived and defeated all the odds and obstacles you describe on wits alone (everyone take a shot each time @secretfire humblebrags about how clever or smart she and Tolssk are), then you must think everyone reading this is an idiot. Anyone who has ever played a d20 game knows that's not a thing, especially over and over again. If you're winning that much against all those odds its because you cheesed the system.
And to be very clear, I'm not accusing you of anything and I don't know what your sheet looked like. I'm just telling you straight up that I don't believe you.
There's so much in your post that's eyerolly or just wrong that I'd be here all day addressing it so I'll just pick two parts that inform my opinion of your point of view.
@secretfire said in Star Wars Republic d20 SAGA - (Prequel Era):
- Vapaad was neurotic and insane and never around. The place was basically run by Ataru, who was an amazing GM until he took it over in a staff revolt when Vaapad kept getting more and more crazy. Not Tolssk Crazy. Not 'Hog Pit' Crazy. Bat!@#!#@ @!##!@!@# mad, crazy. Like, Trump Crazy, metaphorically speaking. It then became Dawn of Defiance. Eventually he got busy and left, and there was a third headwiz. I'd left by that point. That was years after the switchover.
Talk about revisionist history! "It then became Dawn of Defiance." So the game just up and turned itself into a brand new game? And gave itself to Ataru? The staff stole the game wholesale from Vaapad. I don't care how crazy Vaapad was, you don't steal someone's entire game. If you have issues with someone's game you leave and you start your own brand new game, not a stolen db where you continue on like nothing happened.
That's such a dick move. And you gloss over it like its nothing. Why? Because just like with Tolssk you seem to remember things, intentionally or unintentionally from your own very biased point of view where the people you like or get along with may do really bad things but its totally justified.
Just no.
@secretfire said in Star Wars Republic d20 SAGA - (Prequel Era):
And neither does that excuse silently banning him, especially after he spent days saying he preferred not to play the character again even for Beta, because it would start issues. I literally personally saw him say that multiple times in cgen before bringing the bit IC. We both opposed bringing back the old bits, and said so.
I also opposed bringing back the old bits. So I didn't. I made a new one. That was an option. Were you unaware? Both you and Tolssk seem to think it is somehow in your favor that despite not thinking this is a good idea, you went ahead and did it anyway. It is not. If you're doing something you know is bad for the game and shouldn't be done just cause you can, it doesn't mitigate the crappiness of what you're doing. It makes it worse.
Also, feel free to keep railing about how bad the Jedi players were. Everyone does on every SW game ever. That's nothing new. Same old complaints, on every game: "Jedi are all pompous, whiny, entitled brats who want everything to go their way." "Dark siders are all selfish, overpowered, twinks who just want to kill everything." Congrats, that's just describing the Star Wars trilogies.