@HelloRaptor said:
"Tattoos are a popular option."
Cue all the whiners who bitch about people having tattoos signifying their supernatural allegiances, despite every wod book since the dawn of time saying characters do so, depicting characters doing so, etc.
I had a character who had the Virtual Adepts symbol tattooed across her back. It wasn't a great idea, but it was fun.
@Ganymede said:
I can see how being around the abused only feeds into the cycle of abuse further, or causes the victims to lose a sense of how the world is supposed to work.
I thought it was pretty straightforward: Bullies beget bullies.
I'm actually starting to feel disillusioned by these Seemings. They don't seem well-nuanced, and I kind of wish they'd go back to stereotypes as a foundation and allow people to build from there. Fortunately they're optional (note: if they're not, that sucks), because I can't think of an existing character concept in my head that would fit any to date.
@Derp said:
That would make ogres impossible to play, in an online environment. TT, sure, you're around a limited group that isn't bellyaching all the time, but on a MU?
The player of an Ogre would have to choose their friends carefully or spend more time alone. This is a tangible flaw, and anyone deliberately trying to pick on this flaw may be spending an unusual amount of time on the floor looking for their teeth.