Jan 15, 2020, 1:08 PM

@Caggles said in Well, this sums up why I RP:

Do you think this separation is more difficult with writing than eg. with music?

For me, it's not about the medium, it's about how likely someone is to say "Okay, but" when you point out this or that artist was kind of an asshole.

If I enjoy a Wagner symphony, am I tacitly expressing a fondness for fascism?

I don't understand music well enough to say whether fascism is ingrained in the text of his music (or if music can even be said to have text), but I don't believe enjoying any artist's art is inherently a sign of support for the artist's worst values. I believe in death of the author, as art is just a series of symbols; so the meaning you assign to them will necessarily be idiosyncratic.

I get the feeling people think I said "If you like Lovecraft, then you hate black people and Jewish people," so I just want to reiterate my original point was only I think it's disingenuous to insist we treat Cthulhu as an immaculate creation which exists separate from the context in which it was dreamt up.

As music is a more abstract form, does it become easier to split artist from art, whereas with writing there are assumptions from the artist which form a baseline for everything written?

Not with me personally. Like, Bryan Adams is kind of an asshole, so I got rid of his music because that knowledge soured my enjoyment of his music. And let's be honest, he only had like six good songs anyway, so no great loss there.

To further muddy it, is this different for fiction vs non-fiction? Does a paper on covalent bonds lose validity if written by a TERF? How about different disciplines? Social sciences vs physics?

Assuming we're still talking about dead people, I'd say nonfiction makes it both easier and more dangerous to compartmentalize, because facts are objective and exist apart from the biases of the scientist (insert caveats here about proper methodology); but more dangerous because the validity of their work can be stolen to grant validity to their shitty ideas. Since we've pretty much stopped publishing studies that repeat experiments to verify their results, it's probably pretty hard to find a different, less shitty source for the same ideas, which is a shame.