Oct 29, 2016, 5:16 AM

@mietze said in RL Anger:

It's largely the "anti-choice" crowd that wishes to defund comprehensive sex education, access to birth control, and opposes increasing "welfare". They also tend to have a dim view of government intervention in things like paid family leave, child care subsidies, ect.

I didn't say anything at all about the anti-choice crowd. My critique of the anti-life crowd is fucking mild compared to my critique of the anti-choice crowd. (In the end I support the anti-life crowd, albeit holding my nose, while I would kick the anti-choice crowd in the collective 'nads if I could.)

Is there hypocrisy on both sides, yeah. But I think you got a switch reversed there. Most 'anti-life" people, myself included, work constantly to up the amount of support families receive so that every woman has a few legitimate choices in front of her, either in becoming pregnant in the first place, or in what they decide to do after.

Does this support extend to actually offering, say, a single mother a place to stay while raising the child? Financial support? ANYTHING at all that mitigates their immediate plight? (Hint: I've been involved in the scene and the answer was largely a huge honking "NO!!" with occasional glorious exceptions.)

Like I said, in the end I support the anti-life crowd, but I think they're largely disingenuous hypocrites. Just less harmful as hypocrites than the anti-choice crowd. Basically the lesser of two evils.