MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. Arkandel
    3. Best
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 9
    • Topics 171
    • Posts 8075
    • Best 3388
    • Controversial 20
    • Groups 4

    Best posts made by Arkandel

    • RE: RL Anger

      Not so much a 'rl' thing since it annoys me on Facebook but still.

      People who can't get past the idea everyone doesn't like the same things, or that if they didn't enjoy a popular thing it doesn't make them special.

      There are so many posts lately from people about Star Wars throwing words like 'sheep' and 'commercialism' around. One particularly special one was bemoaning all the posts the movie is getting versus 'more important issues', which sounds a lot like '... such as stuff I care about'.

      Get over yourselves, folks.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: MSB: The meta-discussion

      @WhatInTheSun said in MSB: The meta-discussion:

      How many people are active on here? In the few places I've read, there's a smallish group that's vocal, then another layer of semi-vocal.

      There's a link at the top where you can see stats about posters, etc.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: RL Anger

      Going back to work tomorrow. On a Monday morning. When it's going to be the coldest day of the winter so far.

      😞

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: MSB: The meta-discussion

      @Gingerlily said in MSB: The meta-discussion:

      I think the people who really dislike MSB and think it is a net negative will not see this thread so they will never comment @Arkandel. There are many people in that camp who still MU* and/or still talk frequently to other people who MU* but there's not really a way to get their input here, so the thread will likely conclude at least in part that MSB is a good thing.

      For sure. But the thread isn't supposed (or at least I didn't mean for it) to be about patting ourselves in our collective backs; it's about taking as honest a look as we can at what we do here.

      There are people who dislike MSB for completely honorable reasons. They want their gaming experience to be about only the fun parts, or they'd rather not peek behind the mirror, or simply think we're full of shit; I have nothing against those folks, and I'd never try to convince them otherwise. To each their own.

      And there are people who don't like the fact we might speak less than kindly of their actions here; well, perhaps they shouldn't be acting in a way that might be spoken of that way. That's not on MSB.

      But you know what? There is a third kind of person who will not post on this thread. I was surprised at how many people with a lot to say and share came out and did so over PMs here who had barely posted once on the forums. In fact one said they never had (and I had only met them over a MU* we both played), but wanted to share how they were being treated on the game they were still on. It's not because they feared retaliation, just... they didn't want the attention, the extra hostility. But they wanted to chat about things with other people in the hobby because who else would understand the weird shit we say and do in the hobby?

      I think that's an important outlet as well. Most of us have seen some weird stuff, right? Whatever underbelly online gaming has is really tough to translate into the real world, isn't it? You can't just go to a RL friend who's never played here and explain it - it's one of those things you need to be part of in the first place to understand.

      MSB does that, too. It provides the sense of community - your buddy might not understand why the hell you'd be upset some 'staff member' of some weird niche hobby game was nasty to you, but folks around here would. At the very least you can share with the rest of the class and see if there was something to be legitimately annoyed or frustrated by.

      I know you and I (the you being Ark again) have discussed at length and in some detail your opinions and my opinions and that was kind of where I ended up then too. I support many of your theories as to why it is or has the potential to be valuable, but am not sold enough to buy stock.

      Sure! But that's the thing too. We don't have to agree to get along. I think it's the key to a forum like this, or maybe even the hobby overall.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • MSB alias/username

      So, why did you pick whatever alias/username you're using for MSB?

      For example 'Arkandel' is my handle online for a bunch of things, and it hails from one of my earliest AD&D characters - he was a non too bright Elven gladiator who really wanted to take back Myth Drannor.

      What's your excuse?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: MSB: The meta-discussion

      @Autumn said in MSB: The meta-discussion:

      The problem I've observed with online fora where vitriolic, jerkish self-presentation is accepted (or actively encouraged) is that eventually, that's all it's about.

      The people who start that sort of forum often do so because they think that a lack of restrictions on debate foster a more honest and open discussion, or because they think calling people out as harshly as possible will make people consider their arguments more carefully, or because it's funny if you do it in as absurd and overblown a manner as possible among friends who know it's all just a gag.

      You know how there are counter-games? Games basically made by disgruntled players of whatever MU* who decide to do the-same-thing-only-better and almost invariable create the same-thing-only-much-worse? The same principle applies to forum philosophies too - by trying to 'free' the conversation, but framing it at the same time, what they're doing is limiting it. A place that's made to talk shit will talk shit; news at eleven!

      And in the manner of all things toxic, eventually all your users are those who thrive in or at least tolerate the toxicity, which is a smaller subset of the folks you actually want sticking around. For extra hilarity observe what happens when the founding fathers come to disagree, too.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: MSB alias/username

      What's with girls claiming they come across as guys around here lately? Is that a thing?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Stuff Done Right

      @crusader That depends on your definition of improvement. What do you want out of your XP system - what are you rewarding, what do you want the XP curve to look like? And just as importantly, what are you prepared to sacrifice to achieve that?

      For example it seems you value activity and want to reward it in a simple manner. Yes, votes do that. They also alienate newbies compared to established players (if I have 5 votes a month you better believe I'm saving them for my coterie/pack) and exchange easy XP for dinosaurs (it's what a year of trading votes with said coterie/pack does, after all).

      Different games have been known to experiment with their approach on this. Some of the new generation nWoD MU* for example employ Beats and Conditions to reward adversity and being challenged at the cost of simplicity.

      Either way what I'm getting at here is that there's always a trade-off, and players value different goals differently.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: More Fitness

      Back at the gym after the holidays. They had a pretty good personal training sessions package I'm taking advantage of, too, to work on form and possibly hit deadlifts again - which I'm always worried about since decades of bad sitting posture and desk-jockey work have done bad things to my lower back.

      But man, I'd love to get away with deadlifts. That'd be awesome.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Why do you play? (Or not.)

      @Three-Eyed-Crow I know this makes me a social pariah but I don't really drink. No reason for it, I just.. I don't like the taste of beer and and I'm only okay with certain wines. Anything stronger just grosses me out a bit.

      So I've been the designated driver my whole life. Meh!

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: RL Anger

      Great gym-chain corporate discount leads to super cheap membership for a year! Yay!

      Awesome 7-session personal training package to kick it all off sounds fun-tastic, whee!

      Midway into the 4th session the trainer takes me to his office and gives me the spiel: Do I care about my health? Am I dedicated enough to be great? Am I willing to invest in my well-being? If so I should pay $7k for a year's worth of sessions!

      @(%*$#

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Strange Game Dev Inquiries from surreality (condensed)

      @bored said in Strange Game Dev Inquiries from surreality (condensed):

      @Roz Really? The very first question is 'what kind of tentacled magical sea creature do you want to be'? I'm pretty sure 'sorry, I don't' is actually a proper response to that question.

      I think it comes down to whether we're posting on threads like this to express our views on this particular issue or whether we're doing it to support this particular issue.

      I did the former myself; while I hoped that it was still helpful it wasn't, so I stopped posting further. It's fair enough. Not all threads are meant to be a sandbox of ideas thrown into the mix, and I suppose it does make threads harder to navigate as they drag into 20+ page monstrosities within a couple of hours in which many individual thoughts can be lost.

      Proposal for MSB admins: A forum specifically meant for system design where things need to stay on topic; specific questions are asked and answers to them must be provided if at all.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: RL Anger

      People who grade books yet to be published - usually quite highly - on sites like Goodreads.

      Yes, I'm looking forward to Doors of Stone too. But it has a 4.45/4 stars rating with 1500+ votes and not one of those people has read it. It just makes the entire rating system unreliable.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Strange Game Dev Inquiries from surreality (condensed)

      @Ganymede said in Strange Game Dev Inquiries from surreality (condensed):

      That said, I'm a bit leery of the idea myself. In my experience, games that have mundanes (non-narwhals) and specials (narwhals) attract staff favoritism accusations and acts.

      How so in this case though? If all of them are equally available without special approval?

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Random links

      @Glitch said:

      Typing game.

      (@^&$* damn you.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Strange Game Dev Inquiries from surreality (condensed)

      @surreality said in Strange Game Dev Inquiries from surreality (condensed):

      This is totally not on topic, but... it would probably surprise you how many people play on Shang from work.

      It's really easy to play Shang (or any MU*) from work in certain industries; for instance I've got a bunch of consoles open filled with text. One more pointed at a MU*, unless it happens to contain ASCII art or something won't stand out to a random passerby - until of course they stop and actually start to read. 🙂

      But say, I had a coworker stop and ask me once about Eldritch's (I think) wiki because it had a big blood splat image right on the front page.

      It really depends on the company. I've worked in places where as long as you did your job no one really gave a shit if you played Starcraft while stuff was compiling, and I'm aware of businesses where you could be let go over reading your personal e-mail. The onus is on players to know what's okay for their circumstances.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: RL Anger

      My fitbit battery is starting to be less than awesome. I charged it on Sunday, didn't use the GPS... I woke up this morning and it was dead as a rock strapped to my wrist.

      ... So I looked up buying a cable so I can charge it at work. $30 for a cable, are you kidding me? Freakin' proprietary crap. I'll order a knockoff one from Amazon at some point but damn.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Strange Game Dev Inquiries from surreality (condensed)

      @Ghost said in Strange Game Dev Inquiries from surreality (condensed):

      Good luck on you and your friend's 7th Sea game, you lifeless fuck.

      Can we please try to stay 'mildly constructive' here?

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: RL Anger

      @Luna said:

      @Arkandel is pretty boss at Fitbit. I beat him one week but not this week. Tooth extraction so holding me back.

      Now I see it. Today's battery incident was no accident. @Luna wants the throne back.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Strange Game Dev Inquiries from surreality (condensed)

      @Gingerlily said in Strange Game Dev Inquiries from surreality (condensed):

      @Arkandel

      So this thread inspires a question for you.

      MSB a net positive for the hobby, or nah?

      PostScript: This is not an actual question, I am trolling Ark because it just seemed to work here.

      I think people can disagree, even fight, anywhere. I've seen similar arguments taking place on a public channel, for example.

      MSB doesn't have the exclusive on these things, you know? Sometimes it doesn't go well and folks walk away pissed off. Other times a disagreement can be civil - I don't think @Ghost is hoping I get food poisoning, for example.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • 1
    • 2
    • 157
    • 158
    • 159
    • 160
    • 161
    • 169
    • 170
    • 159 / 170