@thenomain No. See, I have a different take on this. When I am in the midst of a complete panic flail (which anyone who knows me I do suffer, more often than I'd care to but less often I used to), it only goes both ways to a point. If and when I am cognizant of reacting in ways that are contributing to making an attempt at communication worse, or impossible, it falls to me-- the owner of said reaction-- to go away until I can communicate in a more productive manner because I know, when I am in that place, I am incapable of processing what I am being told in a clear and unbiased fashion. It is coming in through a twisted filter.
I was there and watched you during that conversation. Yes, you acknowledged you were having this issue... but you took no steps to handle or adjust or improve that for the people who were being faced with a full on anxiety meltdown. You did not meet them in the middle. You said you were having this issue... and then expected them to make all of the concessions, while you put your head down and bulled towards what you wanted the outcome to be.
You owned your issues by saying out loud that you have them, to the extend that that is acknowledging they exist, but you didn't move to the necessary second step of handling them, in spite of being urged numerous times to do so. You were requiring them to not only be staff and app staff, but also to play counselor and psychologist for your issues.
Unfair, Theno.