Controversial posts made by Ganymede

@ThatOneDude said:

Was the plan to use other "spheres" (vampire/werewolf/ect)?

No.

@Jaded said:

While it doesn't matter - there are a ton of mods that give you nudity.

That's nice, but I doubt there's as many brothels. If there's one thing I learned from the Witcher, it's that there's a brothel on every corner, apparently.

As for Avallac'h, yes. He is a wretch of a being. But did your dislike for him come before or after the discovery of the laboratory.

Before. He's a dick. I wanted to slit him up the middle. I'm pretty sure he banged Ciri, and forced her to have sex with others.

But, I digress.

@Sunny said:

I don't see where this is in conflict with what I am saying.

It's not. It's me venting frustration regarding that position, but understanding why you've taken it.

@Vorpal said:

So much hate right now >_<

You could always advise her of your recent herpes outbreak, and then ask her if she remembered whether the two of you ever made out on stage or not.

@Wretched said:

Couples that pick on each other, stay together. Unless yer a bunch of little bitches.

I'm no longer allowed to do this, mostly because I'm much better than my partner at these games.

@Arkandel said:

... But I haven't seen a team this good and dominant at least since the 2000-2001 Lakers. They are even better than some of the great Spurs teams.

I'm not so sure I agree.

Golden State has lost to: the Bucks; the Mavericks; the Nuggets; the Pistons; and the Trail Blazers. These aren't great teams (the Mavs are currently the best at 31-28). I'd expect a dominant team to crush the opposition, and only struggle with teams of their caliber -- like the 2000-2001 Lakers.

The Spurs have a better point differential and give up 10 fewer PPG, even if they have a worse record. The Spurs have more home wins, and are still perfect at home (as the Warriors are). In other words, don't over look the Spurs; they could feasibly trounce the Warriors.

@faraday

This is true.

@Bobotron said:

That annoyance when you're trying to figure out what the HELL you need to do for intermittent FMLA....

Define "intermittent" FMLA.

@Sunny said:

Nope! Sam isn't making any decisions for Ingrid.

In your examples, however, Sam's decisions affect Ingrid.

Corollary: Ingrid is Sam's ghoul, and made the ghoul with Sam's knowledge and consent. Presuming that to be true, does your analysis change?

@tragedyjones said:

Someone unban Cirno so he can talk about the lack of people of color in The Witcher.

Why the fuck would there be people of color in that world? It's clearly full of white people with white problems.

@mietze

@Sunny said:

I think that players have no business taking away the agency of other players.

What of the agency of Ingrid's player to play Ingrid as she was designed? Isn't that being taken away by Sam's deliberate evasion?

@Thenomain said:

If you're going to make a reference to me in that way, I'd prefer that you called me ... The Patriarch.

You're old, grumpy, and wear tweed, but you ain't no Krogan, bub.

@mietze said:

But. Is anything repaired and has there been any estimate? Nope. At least in a 3rd world country I could bribe someone.

Where the hell do you live? Ohio has better service than this. And it is Ohio.

@Thenomain

This.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8kRdM7dbJE

@lavit2099 said:

Can't say that. People enjoy political RP too much to say no.

Political RP does not require noble houses. There are plenty of politics among mercenary guilds, farmer co-operatives, families, thieves, merchants, etc. Why do people need titles to think that they can wield political power?

@Thenomain said:

Well sure, but the game was a huge gamble from Hare-Brained Schemes and an untested idea coming out of Kickstarter. If they wanted to jam as much stuff in there as possible (so many cameos, and I do not care for the jester elf) I can't say I'm surprised nor do I blame them.

I'm not surprised, but I can and will blame them. The entire last chapter of the game was so WTF that it kind of broke theme for me, and was unpalatable.