MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. surreality
    3. Best
    • Profile
    • Following 3
    • Followers 15
    • Topics 37
    • Posts 5299
    • Best 2435
    • Controversial 6
    • Groups 4

    Best posts made by surreality

    • RE: Leadership, Spotlight, and PCs of Staffers

      @Miss-Demeanor said in Leadership, Spotlight, and PCs of Staffers:

      C. People are already staffing under the inability to have their PC in scenes that they're running. People are already playing under the inability to have their PC in scenes they're running. We're not losing anything by continuing to disallow it, and I seriously doubt we would be gaining enough by allowing it that would be worth the bullshit that would have to be dealt with.

      Except this isn't a universal constant. Yes, some places have this rule and people follow it -- but it doesn't necessarily mean it's the only set of conditions under which any given game is run or could be run, or that it's necessarily the ideal.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: The Crafting Thread

      @Auspice I know, seriously, this is official our hobby coffee! ...he could make a mint off of the lot of us!

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: Social Combat: Reusing Physical Combat System?

      @Arkandel It isn't the number of successes, though. It's that the only consequence of failure, typically, in a social roll in most systems is 'you didn't get your way'. There's no inherent consequence there, as there absolutely would be if you just saw someone try to punch you and miss, in which case 'you didn't land your punch and now JoeBob knows you want to punch him'.

      This dramatically lessens the potential consequences of a social roll if it fails as compared to a physical one if it fails.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: RL Anger

      @Auspice said in RL Anger:

      I'm overweight. And almost every doctor I've had in the past and told 'Yeah, I haven't been able to really eat much' (such as when my gallbladder was failing) would come back with something along the lines of 'Well you could do to miss a few meals.' 😐

      God, this. I barely eat. Seriously. I barely eat. My husband, while way more active than me, is average size and so help me, he eats easily 6x per day what I do -- easily. I am that person who has a slice of pizza, or 1/3 of a normal sized sandwich when we eat out, and farm the rest out for leftovers.

      Yet my ass, it is large. No, it is not because I just eat pizza and crap. (We do that about once every 2 months.) I drop weight like mad on Atkins, but that shit's expensive even if you're cooking everything yourself and getting less fancy meat and whatnot. 😕 (Hilariously, the week on that I had huge amounts of bacon daily I lost 12 pounds and it stayed off for six months... somebody has to explain that shit to me because seriously that's freaky.)

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: Coming Soon: Arx, After the Reckoning

      That is a highly neat idea, @Apos.

      Could be a useful RP tool, too, if people can view the impressions people have had of them? (I don't know if they can or not, attributed or otherwise.) It'd be a great way to see if you're hitting the mark you aim for in your character's portrayal and such.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: Mental Health and Grown Up Stuff

      D.C. is absolutely near enough to my neck of the woods that I would happily crash any MSB gathering that bothered to tell me where it was happening.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: How Do I Headwiz?

      @HelloProject When I'm less bleary-headed and whatnot, I can pass along info on how I was going to do it, though really... @Coin more or less covered it. There was a small trickle of 'daily XP' people would get on their charbit (0.1xp/day in a system with similar costs to CoD, so around 36.5xp/year per PC bit unique to that PC bit, which is definitely a trickle), but anything earned through activity (plot participation, random 'everybody gets XP for a holiday', contributing neat new content for everyone on the game to use, etc.) would go to a core player bit for the player, to distribute as they choose. Could be saved up to spend on a new character later, etc., too.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: RL Anger

      @Auspice The year the yarn (and/or other craft supplies) get nominated, that is the year this tradition will end. Trust me on this.

      Otherwise, this is brilliant. 😄

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: Coming Soon: Arx, After the Reckoning

      @Thenomain said in Coming Soon: Arx, After the Reckoning:

      <facebook>"Share" if you remember random emitters for everything from weather to room ambience; "Like" if it made you grit your teeth.</facebook>

      I actually love these and always have. I also recognize that many people don't. That's why I support everyone who loves them to definitely use them -- but to please have a way that the people who hate them can turn them off, since they can get repetitive, and make them opt-in at the outset. You can always do special announcement/custom things that everyone really needs to see (like a game-wide announcement that a bomb just went off, etc.) unfiltered in a different way so folks still see the stuff that's relevant/genuinely unique and important.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: RL Anger

      @Auspice An instructor telling me to to do that would have me demanding to see their portfolio and qualifications to be teaching that course, because wow.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: MSB MU*?

      <shares coffee/vodka/tea/xanax (pick your favorite) in empathy>

      It really is an eye-opener when that hits. I have had... more than a few shocked spit-takes over the past few months, including a round or two of that one. 😕

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: RL Anger

      @Shiggy said in RL Anger:

      But please, reign in the rhetoric about how I'm an evil white man when I say "but we should also try to balance the fucking budget."

      And the day I do that, go on with all the ranting you want.

      Edit: I am a stereotypical libra, registered independent, and have no qualms voting a split ticket based on the actual human beings who are on it at the time, because I have the good fortune of living in a reasonably moderate state in which party politics have historically been less dramatic than in others, and until the days of the Tea Party, politics were sane here. I live in the land of Christine O'Donnell, man. Where we were all -- irrelevant of party -- looking forward to voting for Mike Castle until he got kicked off the ticket in the primary. Go on back and look into that one. So you can seriously blow me with that assumption.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: MSB MU*?

      @Catsmeow The ones that get to me the most are the ones who will smack-talk the shit out of absolutely everyone who crosses their path, but insist, "Oh, but I would never do that to you!!!" like you're supposed to believe that shit for a hot minute and trust them completely.

      That statement always strikes me as being especially precious every time I hear it, and if you read 'precious' in that sort of condescending 'bless your heart' 'all the headpats and fake smiles' tone, it's still nowhere near as 'I just sucked on a lemon filled with battery acid that murdered my grandmother and am trying to smile through it all' as it really deserves to be.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: RL Anger

      @Shiggy First: there is a politics forum for a reason and this really ain't it.

      When you find in the party platform the bit about screeching at you for being a straight white man, do please post it there. I will even join that part of the forum to read it.

      Also, I am the last person you want to get into an abortion debate with.

      Frankly, I am still pissed Uncle Joe got discouraged from running, and it's not just because he's the home town hero in these parts. The ability to talk to people as people and exercise common sense and moderation and compromise are pretty fucking essential, and the more either party screams about gatekeeper issue 'test cases' and similar, the more ridiculous shit gets. Everything becomes an 'alternative fact' when no one is paying real attention to what anyone not within their own echo chamber is saying, which is a fundamentally dangerous situation for all of the people trying to live under such conditions. Namely, all of us.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: MSB MU*?

      @Catsmeow Pretty much that. Like... I have had the chance to get to know some folks in the hobby (some on the forums, some who never have been) well enough to know where plenty of bodies are buried re: RL stuff. I'd still never repeat that stuff, even if I dislike the person intensely.

      Something game-ethics related? Yeah, if somebody wants that to not get out, they really need to just not tell me, because I can't just... not say something, even if it's telling them, "That is so not OK," and if it isn't knocked off? Yeah, I will say something. So if somebody wants to be an unethical ass on a game, seriously: don't tell me.

      RL stuff, though? That's somebody's life, not public entertainment fodder. I realize a lot of people don't bother making that distinction, so there's probably all manner of 'fun' stuff I've shared privately with people that has made the rounds, which is partly why I'm a cagey cow these days.

      I just... kinda can't do that. So I figure there have to be other people who are the same, just like the people who think any given personal RL tidbit they find out is a new toy to play with. At least there's consolation in knowing it goes both ways?

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: RL Anger

      @Shiggy said in RL Anger:

      I'd really like to have a conversation about how to make Trumpcare better than Obamacare, but instead all we can have are rabid defense of Trumpcare or rabid defense of Obamacare, both of which are deeply flawed in different ways.

      This is a common sense, realistic, sane human being approach to the current problem, even if we may not ultimately agree about what 'better' would look like.

      Have some coffee, spike it if you gotta, because yes, pretty much this, this is the point I see from where I'm sitting.

      I do not agree with you about the idea that people think white, straight men are the devil. Some, yes. Some people think any grouping of individuals is precisely that.

      Any realistic discussion of privilege? Recognizes that it exists on a spectrum, and any given individual is going to fall at different points in different ways. You will never have to live in fear that if you become pregnant, you will be relegated to spend the remainder of your life in a wheelchair at best; that is a privilege, and it's real. I will also never have to face the potential of a former sex partner come to me out of nowhere and, a decade after I have heard from them, say: I have had your baby, and you need to give me money going forward for the support of that child. That is a challenge you could face and I cannot; that is a privilege I have that you do not.

      Both of these things require an attempt at understanding and human empathy is required to even begin to achieve that understanding, because these things are outside the realm of our possible and personal experience. When we make decisions about them, we cannot only think of ourselves and what we want.

      You and I will not face the problems someone who is not white will face in America. That's just a fact. It does not mean that as white people, we cannot have problems, we cannot face suffering, we cannot be subject to unfairness or harsh circumstance. It means that there is a subset of experiences we have the privilege of not being subject to in this country that have a real impact on people's lives.

      This is not a difficult principle to understand on the most basic level. Most people of my generation and those after -- I'm 43, for whatever that matters -- understand this as a general principle.

      Most of us have internalized the idea that the color of someone's skin or their gender should not matter in regard to how we treat that person as a fellow human being, for instance, but our lack of being someone different than ourselves is still something we cannot understand in the same way, and the lesson of listening to those experiences in order to enable us to come to that understanding is a more difficult lesson to internalize. As a result, we treat others 'just like us', and think this is enough to balance the scales; in an ideal world, this would be the case, but it is not functionally so in a reality that is still riddled with flaws, because our experiences are different, and we are still in some ways blind to the ways in which this is so.

      Broadly speaking, intentions are good. Very few people actually embrace hate and shrill horribleness and othering with the intent to do so.

      It still doesn't change the basic fact that you and I might face certain class or income-based suffering that someone of another race in another social class or with considerably higher income does not. That's something that happens, it's something that's real, and it's something we collectively ignore at our own peril. It also doesn't change the fact that that same person of another race may face suffering that we do not, even if it isn't the same suffering, which we also ignore at our own collective peril.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: MU Things I Love

      @Faceless I've actually had a few dreams over the years that led to cool scenes. Usually just some odd mental image that pops up in the dream and hits the right '...that would be cool, I'm gonna run with that!' nerve. Rare, but very much fun cool the times it happened. 🙂

      More or less this conversation has happened more than once:

      "Where'd that come from?"
      "Dreamed it."
      "Seriously?"
      "Seriously."
      "That's cool! ...dork. :P"
      "You liked it, too! Dork. :P"
      <RP resumes as normal>

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: RL Anger

      @Shiggy You just get a <pat pat pat> at this point. Keep raging on, man. Whole world's clearly against you.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: What do RPGs *never* handle in mu*'s? What *should* they handle?

      @Pyrephox Yup, that exactly! And a lot of people who talk about the 'this is crossing into OOC massive discomfort zones/driving players away/etc.' are talking about those things as the source of problems. Dealing with it on a subject matter level, well... every damn one of those things have been huge drama magnets. Having to get on record what people agreed to and when in regard to them, not even taking mechanics or systems into account, can be of enormous benefit to staff if they later have to mediate something in regard to one of those issues, which is an added bonus. (And all too often, they do.)

      Those are the kind of subjects most folks are talking about when they say, "Don't care what the system says, that is going to lead places uncomfortable enough for me as a player if they are forced down my throat that I'm not going to want to play that character any more." If a character is killed IC, at least there's a story and closure there. When you have to retire them because someone's OOC whims and dice pool made them too unpalatable to ever play again -- especially when you will be expected to continue playing them with those things in place? Yeah, that really is worse than (IC) death, and all the FtB in the world isn't gonna help. 😕

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      surreality
      surreality
    • RE: RL Anger

      @Shiggy Very astute! It was a snarky comment. Yours was a tragically unimpressive meme image.

      (You stopped being worth any actual argument when you trotted out the "I am the most persecuted of victims because I am a white male" shit again, and again, and again.)

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      surreality
      surreality
    • 1
    • 2
    • 102
    • 103
    • 104
    • 105
    • 106
    • 121
    • 122
    • 104 / 122