@Gingerlily said in Date Thenomain:
@Thenomain because this is a thread about you, what's your take? 3-D movies, yes or no?
Largely no. For the spectacle, sure; Captain Eo was certainly fun nonsense. And Avatar so far is the only movie I've seen in 3D that was produced well for 3D.
Let me expand that Avatar was also well directed, the sound effects were gorgeous, the visual direction was breathtaking, and the acting wasn't half bad either. The script was so cringe inducing that you would have to pay me to see it again.
An extremely award winning director (involved with the French original Beauty & The Beast, perhaps?) once said in an interview that no matter how good the actors, nothing can save a bad script. He directed one such movie to make that point. The interview was on Fresh Aire (Terry Gross specifically), but that's all I remember.
The kind of visual science people who design video cameras, and directors who are at that level, also complain that the glasses dim the light range and few movies, at the time I read this, bothered to adjust for it. It also diminished contrast, which is harder to adjust for. Perhaps we're better with these things now, but I still have to generally say "no" to 3D.
Not a snobby "no", just a "probably not worth it, no".