@The-Tree-of-Woe said:
Pledges, in part. I don't like free candy, for various reasons.
Eh, it's pretty minor free candy. Changeling's system is designed for very small advantages adding up. Played right, this is a risk, though, as the people you're getting free candy from create a bond, and that bond can be exploited. Mage players can get free candy, too, unless you call "having to roll and ignoring all other thematic aspects of the system" something other than free candy. It sure is cheaper than it should be.
Mage has more than its share of unfairly gaming the system, and as a hobby we have gotten used to the phrase, "the rules don't say I can't", when only half the game is about rules. You're preaching to the choir, but until everyone stops allowing it, everyone will keep doing it.
A big part of Changeling is snorting people's emotions like magic coke
I don't see how this pisses on anything. It takes away nothing from the other person. You don't even have to manipulate a thing to get your fix, you just have to experience it.
Did you ever think of the implications of fucking with people's desires, sorrows, or anger?
Every goddamn day I logged in, but I don't think you read the same book that I did. In Changeling, there is only one thematic abuse you must agree to, and that's the one that made you into a Changeling. You don't need to manipulate anyone else, or any more that we do to each other day to day just by being social creatures.
In Mage, you agree to lie to the world, every day, without remorse, and fight over scraps of political power behind the scenes. That's hubris. That's pretty fucking barbaric.
Another part of what bugged me was how many people with emotional abuse issues completely missed the trick on this.
It's not a trick. It's spelled out in black and white. It could be they (sub-)consciously don't want to admit to it, or it could be that it's just a game and they expect people with triggers to be self-aware enough to stand up and speak out about them.
Nah, just kidding. I expect people with triggers about things to be as adult as those who like to manipulate people over the same things.
Part of it is my own tendency toward bitterness. Thinking back? Most of my bile is reserved for Liam's player. I never said I wasn't a hypocrite, or that I didn't hold grudges.
Oh, well, Liam could be an utter prick, though I got along with him far better than I did the Lokis or the Spiders. I simply didn't trust anyone entirely first go.
@Miss-Demeanor said:
Ummmmmm... didn't you play in the sphere with two Disciplines that don't just influence mental/emotional states but actually FORCE someone to think/feel a specific way? How is it okay for Vampires to completely control a person's mental/emotional state but its not okay for Changeling's to influence them?
He did say that 1) he was different then and 2) wasn't proud of himself. I think that pretty much covers that.
A lot of people don't like the Child Abuse overtone that is the Durance, but I myself like that the game can be about overcoming this, if you want to acknowledge it at all. I don't think the game of Chagneling itself pisses on anyone who doesn't want to get involved, so all harm is self-inflicted.
interesting post-script: Back when my gaming group was still playing RPGs, one member refused to play (original) Mage because it pretty much said to him that God did not exist. I think we could have made some minor changes to make that work, but that was his objection, so we didn't play it.
See, I think not only do we have a bad habit forgetting that the other players we're dealing with are human beings, but sometimes we forget that we always have the ability of reminding them that we're human beings. We agree on a certain theme and setting and rules, but we agree as players, not as characters.