@Arkandel said:
@peasoupling said:
Many Muslims choose to renounce the religion entirely too, without reprisal. Of course, these usually live outside theocracies or extremist communities. Theocracies are awful, and fundamentalism is awful, and Islam has very serious and troubling issues with those.
Yes, and it's theocracies (or any other type of extreme regime which focuses on its own values to suppress individual expression) which are the problem, not the religion in question. There have been points in time when not being a Christian - or, hell, just a different flavor of one - could absolutely get you killed and/or tortured.
Religion has been used as a vehicle to power before and its exact contents are preeeetty much irrelevant. Christianity claims awful lot of "love your neighbor" and "turn the other cheek" mandates yet large scale atrocities have been committed in its name. To those who just want to blow shit up and burn shit down any ol' holy book will do as a banner.
I generally agree. I'm not completely sure that religion has no influence, or that some religious texts and traditions might not be more prone, for historical reasons, to terrible interpretations and justifications. Some forms of Islam are awful, in and of themselves, as religions. For example, the garbage woman-hating death cult version that asshole wealthy Saudi fundamentalists like to fund around the world.
But I also think that there isn't an Islam or a Christianity, there are Islams and Christianities, and the general name just refers to a lot of different, vaguely related sets of beliefs that claim descent from the same revelation. There are also awful forms of Christianity, it's just that they aren't as popular these days, or they don't have as much power. You do have things like American Evangelicals funding murderous homophobia in Africa, but it's on a different scale.
But then I don't see a lot of people condemning Buddhism as a whole because of Buddhist violence in Southeast Asia, either.