@derp
Yep yep.
A Hobbesian would argue it's better this way, though, as the State of Nature is the same as the State of War. Those wolves outside of captivity are truly free - free to catch horrible parasites and diseases, free to get into fights with other packs of wolves, free to get frostbite or hypothermia during a sudden blizzard, free to die to farmers with rifles annoyed with them killing their livestock. We submit to government because otherwise we will murder each other, shit in creeks, and die dirty and starving.
A Lockean would say that civilization maintains something close to the State of Nature (a kind of garden of Eden-esque state where everyone is free and there is no private property and things are all sunny and happy) from the State of War that develops as the exercise of those freedoms possibly violate the rights of others. So to establish a third-party as a mediator, we collectively form a government/civilization.
Both say pretty much the same thing - government/civilization makes us get along and live in a developed society with things like electricity and clean water. The difference is that the moment civilization goes poof, Hobbes says we murderfuck everything and Locke says we kind of annoy each other and decide maybe we should have government afterall.