Nov 15, 2019, 9:58 PM

Part of that discussion by necessity should include not only ideals but common (and uncommon) things that are likely to happen to fall short.

And IMO permission for people to also have varying degrees of risk adversity be able to discuss their concerns without it turning into either "whaddya expect, it's the wild west and anything goes" or "if you participate in any game at all that isn't secured and there's the possibility of people chatting about other than game stuff then you are stupid." There's a huge middle ground there, and I personally think there is a lot of room for different standards on different games too. Both in what they promise "wont happen" and in how they respond when things do happen.