@ganymede said in RL things I love:
Economically, I believe that rewards are commensurate with results. If you've been at a company for a long time, but produce the same results as a person who has been there half that time, why should there be any difference in compensation.
Because economically, sustainability is important. If someone can sustain half the productivity for more than twice longer than someone can sustain twice as much, the company's long-term investment in that person has yielded better results.
Also consider the amount it takes to hire someone. This isn't reflected in the instanced view of how much productivity one person has, but the complete view.
We obviously disagree with this, but from my more physics-based learning I must remind business people more frequently than I'd like that work is force over time.
--
Oh, er, this is the RL Things I Love thread, isn't it.
Okay, I bought an iPhone 8 today.
Because I also bought AirPods, my monthly credit card statement will be $20 lower, because I get longer to pay it off without interest.
Oh darn.