@Arkandel said in Recent banning:
It can also point to situations like what Theno posted where history is effectively rewritten and there's no record of their posts any more.
As a note, it already does this, given that you've got it set up to blank all the posts by the banned party.
@Ghost said in Recent banning:
@Derp said in Recent banning:
@Ghost said in Recent banning:
jb4i48vuHABnw9c8!#34
How did you find my e-mail password?!?
No lie. My middle name is literally "BruteForce".
That's hot af.
@Ghost said in TS - Danger zone:
Are there any more games left that prohibit TS? Sounds like a bad investment idea on the part of the people who took the time to stand the game up.
Ostensibly, yes. I play on at least one where it's a halfway written rule. But those staffers are at least smart enough to know that they're never going to be able to enforce such a rule, so it's not treated like a Big Deal.
@DareDaemon said in TS - Danger zone:
@Tinuviel said in TS - Danger zone:
@DareDaemon said in TS - Danger zone:
And, presumably, the game doesn't explicitly prohibit TS. (I've encountered people who wouldn't let such a rule stop them.)
I absolutely don't let such a rule stop me.
If you don't like that a game prohibits TS, don't fucking play there. It's fucking gross to violate such a clear boundary.
Nobody tells me how to play my own character but me. I'll decide if and who he bangs, not a staff policy that they have no way of actually enforcing in the age of Discord anyway. Kthx.
@Misadventure said in I need a god damn Expanse MU.:
How do you keep the enthusiasm the show/books have with the game?
I mean, it comes pre-packaged with its own fanbase. Like most things based on existant IPs. I don't think you're gonna get too many new people who just love-love it based on game mechanics. You either read/watch it and dig it or you don't. If you don't know what those are in the first place, there is literally nothing that distinguishes it from generic sci-fi.
And I disagree, mechanics can make or break a game(or do nothing either way). EG the humanity and Virtue mechanics in Vampire changed up how people looked at system+themes, despite CyberPunk and Pendragon already having done the same basic thing.
I -- disagree that this mechanical change changed the theme of the game. The themes changed, and they tweaked the mechanics accordingly to allow for greater flexibility.
@Misadventure said in I need a god damn Expanse MU.:
Given the mentioning of generic rules, what is it about this setting that actually creates stories specific to it? How is the feel of the books or show going to come across?
By way of example, the Altred Carbon setting has cortical stacks and the ultra rich immortal class, combined tocreate a specific economy and outlook of humanity etc. After that its just a sci-fi setting, with action and crime as its focus.
What makes The Exapanse?
I'm not entirely sure that I understand the question.
Are you asking what mechanical rules will bring the theme of the books to the fore? Because I don't really think those two things are related all that much. Theme is theme. Mechanics are mechanics. So long as whatever system you use doesn't wildly diverge from the theme (say, spellcasters in Altered Carbon settings) it should be fine. I'm not sure it's the job of the mechanics to bring the theme of the game to the fore.
I hate how it's been roughly a year and I still get messages from people about my sex life that I shared with someone on this board in confidence.
How has everyone around here enjoyed knowing about that btw?
Why don't you ever tell me any of the good shit?!
@Tinuviel said in TS - Danger zone:
If they TS using NPCs I feel that it's wrong because then one person is being prioritised over others when it comes to that NPC's time.
Surprising no one, staff do this all the time without sex. Not everyone has an equal right to an NPC's time or effort. Staff always prioritizes.
No, I didn't call you a prude. I have no idea what your preferences are.
I'm simply saying that by insisting that people abide by whatever terms you're using, which you absolutely just did, you're attempting to constrain a definition for the purposes of your argument.
What if people don't agree that the 'two terms are distinct' thing you're arguing is a valid argument, as they can be close enough to synonymous as to make no difference? What if people then, having opted to not follow those, disagree with the potential dire ramifications that you've laid out?
Nobody is setting up a straw man. I'm saying that I don't accept the premise of your argument because I think you're making a pointless distinction to prop up an argument that people don't agree with otherwise. That's not setting up a straw man. That's just me saying 'I see what you did there, but no'.
@bored said in TS - Danger zone:
First, again, since no one in this thread seems to be able to keep the two terms apart
I mean, I know how annoying it can be when people refuse to stick to the definitions that you've laid out for the argument, because the argument breaks down otherwise, but I think in this case you're needlessly splitting hairs, and people aren't quite as offended by 'not-posed-out sex' and 'posed-out-sex' as you'd like them to be for purposes of making an ethical argument that people are disagreeing is an ethical problem.
@WildBaboons said in TS - Danger zone:
But is TSing the prince more viable than FTB with the prince?
Probably not? I mean, I'd take it to FTB, but if people wanna play it out then is there any practical difference?
@bored said in TS - Danger zone:
your uber powerful NPC Vampire Prince, elf Prince, Jedi Master, etc being used to do RP that seems much more PC-like rather than being used a critical force to drive the plot.
Says who? Can those people not be seduced? Are they somehow immune? If so, then you're looking at potentially bigger problems than who's boinking who, and I would consider that a bigger staffing red flag than if they were just getting busy with someone, especially since there are often systems to handle who's getting what out of a relationship.
@bored said in TS - Danger zone:
Does it seriously matter? It probably depends on the game. I think most people would be upset if they found out, for instance, that PC X became the controller/leader of a new org/fief/resource/whatever based on having been granted a boon by fucking an influential NPC run by their usual PC TS partner. Right?
I think they probably would. I also would tell them that they most likely had equal opportunity to do so, and didn't. I don't TS on my own NPCs because frankly I don't have time and I don't like many people that much, but I'm not ruling that out as a viable path to power, because it's a completely legit way to get it.
@WildBaboons said in TS - Danger zone:
NPC turns into a millions spiders upon climax
Quit reading my character sheets!
@Auspice said in TS - Danger zone:
My male chars get hit on far more than my female chars.
¯\__(ツ)_/¯
Quit picking all the hotties!