@faraday said in How should IC discrimination be handled?:
Of course. But that's OOC abuse. We were talking about IC behavior.
This is true, but the choice to engage in IC discriminatory behavior or language is an OOC one.
If we presume for a moment that PCs have no real existence or life outside of the player behind the screen, then a PC engages in IC discriminatory behavior at the behest of the player, and is an OOC choice regarding how to engage in RP.
As another example, if I'm doing on-stage improv and a partner decides to use derogatory or abuse language I am well within my rights to stop what I'm doing and demand that the partner stop as well. Even if that language is reasonable within the scene in which we are acting, the choice to demand the cessation of such language is also reasonable.
I know you're not arguing to the contrary, which brings me to the next point.
What's being debated is whether and how people should be allowed to avoid such parts of the theme entirely - and what impacts that has on other players.
Even if a theme has discriminatory elements -- i.e., in BSG, the Tauron-Caprican conflict -- I do think that a Tauron player can demand that a Caprican player cease engaging in some RP, even if it is within the theme and setting. I think it is reasonable to presume that the Tauron player understands that there could be discrimination and accepts it, but, at the same time, I don't think that means that it is unreasonable for them to expect the Caprican player to stop.
But this is different than if the Tauron player blithely ignores that part of the setting, and expects that every Caprican is going to treat them nicely; in that case, while the Tauron player can ask to avoid that kind of RP, it would probably behoove staff to step in and politely inform the player that he/she/it shouldn't expected to be treated as an equal ICly, if his/her/its PC ends up on a Caprican crew.