Posts made by Ganymede

@zombiegenesis

I think players find them very important.

I played on New Orleans, and tried to attract people to it. The lack of bloodlines was a huge hindrance to that.

There are some bloodlines available online, notably the Khaibit and the Kerberos. I like both of them, but I believe the way the Khaibit are created makes more sense.

I suggest making bloodlines on your own. I did this for The Descent, and the folks there seemed to like my suggestions and writings. If you want some help on this end, let me know and I'd be happy to sit down and talk about my experiences with writing up 2E translations of bloodlines or "original" ones.

@thenomain said in RL Anger:

I...just realized that our public services are Socialism.

Yeah. I mean, seriously, how dare they sneak that in?

It's not like it's in The Wealth of Nations or anything either, that socialist stuff.

(Hint: It is. Peasants.)

@thenomain

Hey. Go fuck yourself, man.

I mean this nicely.

@Thenomain

Game of Buckeyes.

@dontpanda said in RL Anger:

Taxation is theft in general.

I hear this a lot in Ohio.

I don't even know where to begin as to why this statement is factually, legally, and morally incorrect.

@arkandel said in RL Anger:

But also consider the hidden costs of all this. For example say that Amazon comes to your part of the woods! A big win, for sure. However how screwed would you be if you were running a local business and now had to compete on recruitment for the same people as they do? How about if you're not an employee but were hoping to rent (or, worse, own) a house there when the real estate market skyrockets?

These aren't hidden costs. These should be expected costs. And there are expected benefits too: how about if you do own property near Amazon when it opens up? And what about the small business that can expect an increase in business due to Amazon's appearance, such as a restaurant owner?

I had a brief discussion with a friend about gentrification. Naturally, he was against it. I tried to point out the benefits and, more importantly, the inevitability of gentrification, but, as Surreality pointed out, he stood on the line of the tribe he chose to follow.

What grinds my gears is how tribalism has led to the calcification of the economy. Decisions should be decided by evidence and numbers, not outdated concepts or traditions. The United States is getting ground to a pulp economically in many sectors because it stubbornly refuses to innovate, and then, when it does, you get a GIANT FUCKING PUMPKIN that rears his stupid head and tries to plant anti-capitalist tariffs to destroy an innovative industry.

Stupidity will be the death of us all.

@arkandel said in RL Anger:

In the mean time not only them but everyone is deprived of extra taxes that would cover part of the impact the business has, and over time as the corporation's profit margins wise, everyone else's shrink. The fabled trickle-down effect in the economy is lessened; financial markers might be going up, but personal wealth is reduced for the majority. The middle class taking hits is never a good thing in the long run.

Just because the trickle-down effect is lessened doesn't make it any more real.

The unfortunate reality is that corporations can command those sorts of incentives -- and do. There's no prohibition to do so, and cities would be foolish to not entertain them.

There is a substantial economic impact when a business is lost, and when a business is gained. While it would be preferable that a city not slit its own throat to get a business, having Amazon set their new HQ in a place like Dayton (where I live) would be a major coup. And given how many businesses Dayton's lost (NCR, Mead, Reynolds & Reynolds, etc.), Amazon's decision would be a ridiculous shot in the arm.

I guess I simply find it luxuriant to pay lip service to how wrong the process is -- you're not incorrect -- when the grim reality is that the benefit is demonstrably worth what is described as a "cost."

It's like the progressives who poo-poo Schumer for the deal he struck, which was actually a victory.

@arkandel said in RL Anger:

Whichever city wins their favor (and all the other suitors for that matter) will still be among the major market segments the company's products will be sold in, its local infrastructure will bear the weight of all the extra traffic resulting from the logistical impact the mere existence of the headquarters will have, yet they will pay peanuts compared to other local companies who've been there all along. It will be overall better in the long run - but everyone else will be worse for it.

I don't mean to start a political argument -- we can do that elsewhere -- but is there something inherently wrong with municipal corporations and/or townships or counties competing against one another to attract employers that will draw in much-needed commercial activity and income taxes?

@thatguythere

I mean that if I had to pick a winner, I’d pick Brady.

@seraphim73

All stats mean something if taken in the aggregate.

New England beat Tennessee; not hard. Then they barely got past Bortles and the Kittens. Their defense hasn’t been challenged.

It is a close call, but I’m not going to bet against Brady. Unless you’re the Ravens or the Mannings, you ain’t gonna win.

Is there a new addy? I missed it.

Because I like WoD 2E.

@thugheaven said in Armageddon MUD:

Usually when two sides disagree on something like this they say “we’re going to have to agree to disagree”.

I’m going to invoke that right now so that we don’t cause anymore temporary insanity.

I disagree that we're going to have to agree to disagree.

I also disagree with taking efforts to not case any more insanity.

(Actually, I don't. Take the above with a grain of salt, if you will.)

@autumn

Polywho?

Miss you, dammit.

@thatguythere said in The Football Thread:

I thought that as soon as the Pats won the AFC championship, Belichek and Patricia with two weeks to prepare will eat Foles alive, I think the Eagles D will keep the score from getting out of hand though.

Here's some food for thought:

The Vikings had the best total defense during the regular season at 275.9 YPG. Foles made almost 80% of his passes against them. Philly had the 4th best total defense at 306.5 YPG; New England had the 29th rated defense at 366.0 YPG.

New England had the best total offense during the regular season at 394.2 YPG. Philly had the 7th with 365.8 YPG.

Looking closely at their offenses, Philly averaged 4.5 Yds/A on the ground to New England's 4.2 Yds/A. Philly averaged 132.2 Yds/G on the ground to New England's 118.1 Yds/G. New England creams Philly in the air, though, with 7.9 Yds/A and 276 Yds/G against 7.0 Yds/A and 234 Yds/G. But their PPG are the same, at 28.6.

Look closely at their defenses, Philly had more passes defended and more interceptions. New England had more sacks.

In the post season, Philly is 3rd and 2nd in total offense and defense, respectively. New England is 4th and 3rd, with a 4.0 and 12.5 YPG difference in each category.

So, it's not so clean and easy. The Patriots are thin at linebacker and their secondary. They allowed 39% of 3rd Down Attempts to convert (20th), whereas the Eagles allowed 32% (3rd). They are a tad worse at Pts./G than the Eagles, but not significantly.

But where things break down is in Yards/Play, where the Patriots are giving up an astounding 5.7 Yds/P, and the Eagles are only giving up 5.0 Yds/P. That means, for every three downs, the Patriots are giving up an extra 2.1 yards.

It's a bit more of a toss-up, I'd say. Your stats edge goes to Philly, but New England's still pretty solid.

@thugheaven said in Armageddon MUD:

When I point out there is a forum and a discord. I’m pointing out that the game is not all that opaque. Not that you should jump on chat in the middle of a scene. Hopefully if you’ve applied for a character, you’ve taken some time to read the documentation. But if you haven’t, you said it yourself people don’t like to read. Then that’s another issue, but it’s not “Armageddon punishes new players.”

We have dedicated a couple of threads to problems many of us have had getting into new games.

What I believe many of us are talking about are common barriers to entry on a game. You have a forum, but how does a newbie know what information is relevant? You have a discord, but how does a newbie know who is credible? You have material to read through, but how does a newbie know how to interpret the ambiguities and vagueness that will inevitably arise?

Your fellow player(s) (staff?) have by implication highlighted a common sentiment coming from existing players: what have you as a newbie done to earn anything? But the question a newbie is going to come in with is: what has the game done to warrant my time, attention, and interest?

Punitive or not, the demonstrated attitudes from the players supporting the game's structure have not been inviting. What I have heard has been:

• Don't be surprised if you're murdered, mugged, or abused once you come onto the game; and this is totally IC and thematic.

• We'll be happy to answer questions you have, but we're not going to give you any knowledge that you have not earned.

• We have absolutely no problem with PKilling others to quiet them down, so we can help others.

• We want new players butchering people and going on murder sprees.

• Don't trust people, because you might end up getting murdered, mugged, or abused.

• But we'll help you out, really, maybe, perhaps.

All of the above is sort of antithetical to the direction MUSHes are drifting towards, which has been one of accommodation, invitation, and collaboration. And I think you need to understand the audience to which you are messaging.

@faraday said in Armageddon MUD:

Hey, I love video games. But you're not going to convince me that Tomb Raider has anything to do with roleplaying when my "super-awesome adventurer/explorer" Lara Croft is constantly walking into walls and flailing around uselessly just because I the player suck at the game.

That's because if you want to be a super-awesome adventurer/explorer, you should be Aloy.

That, and I have a thing for Merida + dreadlocks.

so hawt

@darinelle said in Recipes!:

My current partner is of the "what you make is amazing, but also I love Taco Bell" variety so I can never quite trust if he means it or if he's just content to eat so he doesn't die and anything would be fine.

Normally, I would just treat my partner like the kids, and tell her shut the fuck up and eat what I put in front of you because it is going inside of you through one end or the other. But she's smart, has keys to a vehicle, and can drive to Taco Bell herself.

Bitch.

@evilcabbage said in Armageddon MUD:

i mean you can find some of that stuff in helpfiles, but i'm not going to personally give you the digs on every single location to hunt every great beast in the entire world just because you rolled in as a 40 year old character.

Why not?

Here's where your game is not as immersive as you'd like it to believe. The character should have that knowledge (unless you dispute that), but the player does not. Your position breaks immersion because it makes no sense to have a 40 year-old hunting veteran not know where good hunting grounds are.

(This presumes you can roll in as a 40 year-old hunting veteran in the first place.)

As Arkandel says, roleplaying is an abstraction. Your position is simulationist.

@evilcabbage said in Armageddon MUD:

so if you're brand new and you roll up a 40 year old, grizzled hunting veteran, should i explain to you as a new player oocly where to find everything because as a 40 year old grizzled hunter you would know all of that, without you as a person having to earn that knowledge yourself?

Yes, because I am not my 40 year-old hunting veteran character.

@ortallus said in Armageddon MUD:

You can teach people about how gritty and dark the game is in a way that leaves them excited, or despondent. Despondent people leave, and don't come back. Excited people stick around.

This is the best take-away here.

I have no grief with games that are thick on IC consequences or that eschew OOC communications on the game. And being up front about that is just fine with me as well.

But this was not the message initially conveyed, in my opinion.

Anyhow, good luck to anyone who plays on this game in the future.