MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. Ominous
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 2
    • Topics 8
    • Posts 1280
    • Best 542
    • Controversial 1
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by Ominous

    • RE: The Desired Experience

      @arkandel said in The Desired Experience:

      To clarify:

      If you have a game like say, Arx, then you have a large playerbase split between X factions such as factions and organizations. These need to be both populated and led; that means you have someone (hopefully at least a few someones!) to play guardsmen types and someone to play their Lord Captain Commander. But at least there are X factions which are not empty. The LCC position could be classified as a 'mover and shaker' in this context.

      On a much smaller game this isn't quite the same. You may have, say, Lancea Sanctum with 1 character, Crones who are empty, Carthians with 3 characters, etc. You can easily end up with too many chiefs and too few Indians, so to speak (and apologies for the outdated figure of speech 🙂 ). If almost everyone is a 'mover and shaker' then no one is.

      I don't know if you'd still disagree but I hope that further elaborates on my initial statement a bit.

      Nope. Disagree entirely. For your premise to be correct games like Dune, Twilight Imperium, Cosmic Encounter, 1830, Republic of Rome, etc. where you play as the head of factions, stellar empires, or robber barons should all suck, since no one is playing the little people. They're fucking great board games. Now take that and add fluff and roleplaying. Done.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: The Desired Experience

      @arkandel said in The Desired Experience:

      There is definitely an expectation, whether voiced or implied, from players who want to play 'movers and shakers'.

      The issue here is, not everyone should and not everyone can be that. Especially in smaller games.

      I think you meant to say the opposite, or, if you didn't, that's incorrect. It's easier for everyone to be a mover and shaker in a smaller game than a larger game. If a game has 15 noble houses vying for influence and there are 15 players, it sounds like everyone that wants to be the head of a noble house gets their wish.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Random funny

      @littlelizard

      I'm a fan of OwlKitty. The Indiana Jones one is great.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: The Desired Experience

      I want the Dune and Republic of Rome board games writ large. I want a strategy and negotiation game on a huge scale with actions taken being based on in-character reasons rather than "Well, that's the move that wins me the game." I want suboptimal moves. I want flavorful moves. But I still want the intrigue and tactics and politics, though.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Recipes and Shit

      @carma

      I am getting flashbacks to college.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Forum wonk

      @ganymede said in Forum wonk:

      If you just want me to choke you, you could always just ask, y'know.

      alt text

      posted in Announcements
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Forum wonk

      @ganymede

      A paper bag and a really good sex toy.

      posted in Announcements
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Forum wonk

      @tinuviel said in Forum wonk:

      Disappointing women isn't that unusual.

      They make many products to address that.

      posted in Announcements
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Health and Wealth and GrownUp Stuff

      @macha

      Booze is always on the menu at my place.

      alt text

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: General MSB announcements

      @silverfox

      Yeah, they got rid of an important line and added a mostly useless line.

      posted in Announcements
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Recipes and Shit

      Yes, please share the slow cooker awesomeness! I would totally do slow cooker meals if I owned a slow cooker. It's on the list of appliances to purchase.

      I have a slow cooker recipe somewhere for an awesome "Mexican" chicken dip that my deceased aunt used to make for every family gathering. When I dig it up, I'll throw it on here too.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Forum wonk

      What does Big Purple (rpg.net) or Something Awful run as forum software? Those bulletin boards are massive and have decades of content on them.

      posted in Announcements
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: The Work Thread

      My workplace is also kind of dicking me around, as I might (very unlikely) have COVID, but nothing to the level of what @Macha is going through with their workplace, so I'll just sit on my peeve and offer support.

      Sorry your workplace is run by a gaggle of dumbasses, @Macha.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Good TV

      @betternow

      Oh, is that when you let your rank fall or start a new account so you get matched with weaker opponents and curbstomp them?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Good TV

      @derp

      I am assuming it's a type of cheating, like stream sniping.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Forum wonk

      @arkandel

      Do we need to start a Patreon? A fundraiser? I can chip in a bit towards that $500.

      posted in Announcements
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Recipes and Shit

      Also, any recipes at the You Suck at Cooking Youtube Channel. All the ones I have tried there are great and usually pretty easy to make.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Recipes and Shit

      Ominous' Two-Hour and Really Fatty Macaroni & Cheese
      aka Ominous' Take on His Mamaw's Mac & Cheese

      Ingredients:
      1 to 2 boxes of large elbow macaroni (Pour the uncooked macaroni in a deep casserole dish. You want enough to fill it between one-third and halfway up, as the macaroni will expand once cooked to fill it the rest of the way.)
      0.5 to 1 stick of butter, melted
      1 cup Cheez-Its, crushed
      Salt
      1-16 oz. box of Velveeta, half cubed and half sliced
      1-16oz. block of extra sharp cheddar cheese, hand shredded
      0.75 to 1-5 oz. wedge of asiago cheese, hand shredded
      2-12 oz. cans of evaporated milk (EVAPORATED Milk not Condensed Milk. If you use the latter, you're making macaroni & cheese flavored room temperature ice cream.)
      Pepper to taste
      Ground cayenne or chipotle pepper to taste
      Ground dried mustard to taste

      Optional Ingredients:
      Crumbled blue cheese to taste
      4 slices of bacon, cooked and crumbled
      Heavy cream instead of evaporated milk, if you want to be really fatty

      Hardware:
      Stockpot
      Lasagna Pan, Deep Casserole Dish, or Dutch Oven
      Cheese Grater
      Cheese Slicer
      Range
      Oven

      Fill a stockpot with one gallon of water and salt heavily. Do not use less than a gallon of water when cooking pasta. Do not use unsalted water when boiling pasta. Otherwise, the dead Italian grandmothers of the world will haunt you.

      While bringing the water to a boil shred and cube all the cheese. Also melt the butter and stir it with the crushed up Cheez-Its. Once the water is boiling add the macaroni to the pot and preheat the oven to 350 degrees Fahrenheit. Cook the pasta to al dente, then drain the water, saving 2 cups of it.

      Add one can of evaporated milk, fresh ground pepper, ground cayenne/chipotle pepper, and ground dried mustard to the pasta, then slowly incorporate the cubed Velveeta, shredded cheddar, shredded asiago, and optional crumbled blue cheese (it does not take much blue cheese to add a little something extra, so go light with it), while stirring, letting the residual heat of the stockpot and pasta melt the cheeses. If it gets too thick, add the second can of evaporated milk. NOTE: The sauce will continue to thicken even once you're done, so aim for a little soupier than you want the finished product. If you need to throw the pot back on a burner to finish melting everything, that's alright, but do it on a low heat. If you need more liquid than the 2 cans of evaporated milk, use the saved pasta water in small additions.

      Once all the cheeses are added and melted, throw in the bacon and stir. Pour the deliciousness into a lasagna pan, deep casserole dish, or dutch oven. Top with the slices of Velveeta and then the Cheez-It crumbles. Place the casserole dish in the oven and bake until the top layer has browned lightly. If it blackens, you didn't use enough butter on the Cheez-Its to fry them. Remove from the oven and serve. Makes enough to give heart disease to a 10-20 member family gathering.

      Note: Again, use evaporated milk or heavy cream, not condensed milk. Condensed milk or more accurately Sweetened Condensed Milk has had sugar added.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Recipes and Shit

      @ganymede

      alt text

      I just got done talking to the Justice League at Union Terminal and they agree that it was indeed a mistake to compare your chili to Cincinnati-style chili, because Cincinnati-style chili is incomparably delicious. Seriously, I have spice packets and cans of it shipped out here to California.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • RE: Recipes and Shit

      @ganymede

      Ahhh, a 1 to 4 chorizo to beef ratio; that helps. Also there's very little liquid, so likely a very thick chili. It sounds a bit like a Cincy style chili in a way or, more accurately, a Texas chili.

      My chili tends to be soupier (all the better to dip a peanut butter sandwich in or crumble cornbread in), so if you like a thicker stew with my recipe, don't add as much crushed tomato and beef stock and/or simmer it for longer than an hour and/or add some cornmeal or cornstarch before simmering.

      Or you could combine Gany's and my chilis by doing 3 lbs of beef and 1 lb of chorizo. I'd add another one to two seasoning packets for all that meat and maybe another bell pepper. It would be a thicker product and the chorizo might not overpower the other flavors.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Ominous
      Ominous
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 63
    • 64
    • 2 / 64