I find it frustrating to have it be implied that to be successful, you have to be online a lot, not have a life, etc. I am not successful because I have a time advantage (being on and being engaged are very different).
I delegate.
I find it frustrating to have it be implied that to be successful, you have to be online a lot, not have a life, etc. I am not successful because I have a time advantage (being on and being engaged are very different).
I delegate.
I use MuClient, love it. On my phone, and I do successfully RP on it provided everybody involved is OK with slow. It's not too unwieldy and you can set up a bunch of shortcuts to enter things in quick (like page longnameomgkeypadtypingthisissuchanothappening=). I'd check it out.
Developing game speaking up here.
I'm planning on including a player-reward system that the bonuses of which can be used across characters, encouraging people to register their alts. We're also going alts-are-public, with the caveat that people can opt-out of being public but the requirements for opting out are very stringent. We won't catch the people determined to lie, it's not possible. Just have to give a good enough carrot and most people will play nice, I think.
Apparently because you completely lack the ability to understand an opposite POV to your own.
And...so? Tea? China?
My statement was in response to equating out a desire for no stupid PC death to wanting complete control. Key words there: desire, complete. The confusion was related to that specific, precise desire. This whole argument started because some folks stated they would not be interested in playing on a game where capricious character death was the thing. So acceptance of a stupid death has zero to do with anything.
Yeah, that was one of my first thoughts watching it. I'm not convinced it would actually make a good setting for RP, there are some pretty big issues with the setting as presented, but doing something heavily inspired by could be really good.
ETA: If I wasn't still on my Dragon Age kick I'd probably be looking at this setting a lot more intently.I think it would be a great use-case for FS3.
@surreality said:
@Misadventure said:
You object to someone knowing you are reading their information?
Knowing? Not really.
Thinking this entitles them to attention -- or anything at all -- beyond that? Vehemently.
(God, I really am apparently sharing a brain with @Rince!)
This, this, this. I don't mind people seeing my info without me knowing, but people being 'clever' (omg someone I really like did this the other day and I wanted to kill her) ruin &afinger for everybody. There's just...not a compelling reason to have it.
How does it help?
What harm does it do?
@Misadventure said:
@lock/pagelock me=!*twit
Which does not work for alts until after they've paged something to you. No preemptive striking.
@crusader said:
What am I? A tiny zebra? A rabid moon monkey? Don't be so transparent. I know what you were doing. You know what you were doing. If you want to pretend otherwise, have at it. Your posts speak for themselves, even if you have an interesting habit of walking back insulting statements and claiming innocence, when called on certain things. Roar on, frenzied mongoose.
So, for clarity's sake 'tiny zebra' and 'rabid moon monkey' are ridiculous in terms of being insults. Taking them seriously...I suggest you take a deep breath, man. I don't actually think you're a zebra or a rabid monkey, let alone a tiny one or a moon one. Relax. My posts are not worth getting worked up over.
You think you know what I was doing. You are incorrect. My posts do speak for themselves, and I think you're going to be very embarrassed about all of this when you cool down.