MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. Tinuviel
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 2
    • Topics 9
    • Posts 3161
    • Best 1668
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Tinuviel

    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @RightMeow said in TS - Danger zone:

      Also @Ganymede - Please come intimidate me with RP. I want to see what all this is about.

      golden girls

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Arkandel said in TS - Danger zone:

      Is a PB ever a dealbreaker because you don't like the model person?

      Absolutely. It's not a dealbreaker in terms of an IC relationship, but I'm not going to start bumping uglies in full and glorious prose. That said, if the 'not liking' goes beyond personal preference and into "that person literally abused puppies (and/or other things. You know what I'm talking about) then I'm probably just going to avoid dealing with the player altogether.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: Real World Peeves, Disgruntlement, and Irks.

      If you use jargon or abbreviations, and you simply assume everyone knows what you're talking about, you don't get to act like a twat when people ask you what the fuck you're talking about.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Wretched Ugh, right?

      I mean I get the whole 'posing the outfit' thing. That makes sense, people wear different clothes day-to-day. But c'mon. I had to write an @desc, it isn't hard to read the damned thing.

      If you "don't have to" read it, then I shouldn't have to write the bloody thing.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @mietze That mostly started because people weren't reading them to begin with, and then reacting to the character... 'incorrectly.'

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @silverfox said in TS - Danger zone:

      I stand ready for any and all derision.

      It's not derision so much as it is... disbelief. And a small feeling of insult. Disbelief at the idea that you manage to roleplay without using the visual core of your imagination. And insult at the idea that I wrote this damned thing, I want it read.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @silverfox said in TS - Danger zone:

      so I also usually avoid reading descs too

      So... how do you know what a character is supposed to look like?

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Jeshin At least in my case I tend to frown on overly sexualised PBs. I don't care about the person in the picture doing or wearing whatever, but the thought process behind the choice of that particular picture out of all the others of the PB? That usually has me looking in askance.

      That and celebrities that have been... rather terrible people, especially if the action is recent.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Arkandel said in TS - Danger zone:

      Alright, I'll get this thread back to its disgusting track by asking all the wrong questions!

      Does the played-by (either your character's or someone else's) matter to you when it comes to TS at all? Does it influence how you play your PC or which characters they pursue or uh, how?

      Not in the sense of attraction, I use the @desc to judge if my character's into them or not. But I do judge people for the kinds of PBs they use, and the people - though that is less a TS judgement and more an RP-in-general judgement.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Jennkryst I find religious discussions with you lot even worse than constantly being reminded Mummy exists, so I opted not to include it.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Arkandel alt text

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Arkandel We've gotten through roleplaying to sex to philosophy back to sex...

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Arkandel said in TS - Danger zone:

      he only consent that really matters is the OOC kind

      Shh, we've stopped talking about TS and we're just talking about sex in general now. Physically impossible sex, but sex none-the-less.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Rinel It comes from within?

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Rinel I was mostly joking, since you were being far too serious in a thread asking the hard-hitting questions like "why do we like to fuck" and "is it my penis or my character's penis."

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Rinel said in TS - Danger zone:

      Buddhism solves this problem

      That's the least accurate phrase ever, in almost any context.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Rinel said in TS - Danger zone:

      @insomniac7809 said in TS - Danger zone:

      If we're talking, like, magical timeline duplicates... now, that's a question that gets into the teleporter paradox. If I go into a machine, Scotty vaporizes me, and then I come back together on the other side, am I still me? If yes, what if he saves the data and pops out another of me? If no, that implies either I stop existing when my component atoms are replaced--which happens every few years--or when my consciousness stops functioning--which implies I did die during my appendectomy (or, rather, he died, I started existing when the anaesthesia wore off.) Do "I", in a discrete sense, actually exist, or am I just a collection of processes that shuffle around in the same general vicinity for a few decades, and if so, isn't a second identical bundle of processes just "more" of me?

      Did you seriously just take a smut thread and turn it into a discourse on the problem of personal identity?

      Fucking hell. Go read some Parfit and get out of here, nerd.

      Is smut and sexuality not the realm of ultimate personal identity's expression?

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @insomniac7809 said in TS - Danger zone:

      If we're talking, like, magical timeline duplicates

      To be fair, if we're talking about clonecest in the context of TS this is usually the route that's taken. An exact copy of the person at that moment, rather than simply genetically identical.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: Echoes in the Mists - CoD 2e MU

      Speaking English is easy if you already speak English. So if you already know, or mosty know, first edition then first edition will seem easy to you because it's not new.

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • RE: TS - Danger zone

      @Arkandel said in TS - Danger zone:

      @magee101 Or impossible. You can't clone yourself in real life as much, but Life is one flexible Arcanum.

      Okay, now we get to the important questions.
      Is boning your clone incest, or masturbation?

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Tinuviel
      Tinuviel
    • 1
    • 2
    • 58
    • 59
    • 60
    • 61
    • 62
    • 158
    • 159
    • 60 / 159