@Misadventure said in Coming Soon: Arx, After the Reckoning:
@WTFE said in Coming Soon: Arx, After the Reckoning:
@Misadventure said in Coming Soon: Arx, After the Reckoning:
In the end, your audience can be stupid.
This, in and of itself, is a strong indicator of your thought processes, now, isn't it?
Yes, but not likely in how you seem to be implying.
Oh, I'm not implying anything. I'm out and out stating that your statement is straightforwardly contemptuous of anybody who disagrees with you. (Like recognizes like, see.)
Let's look at some alternative phrasings of what you said to see if we can get past your ass-burgers and into something resembling enlightenment:
- "In the end, your communication may have been suboptimally worded thus leading to a difference of opinion."
- "In the end, your audience may see something different than what you think you said."
Those are simultaneously more respectful of those who disagreed with you and a bit self-deprecating; I understand people find that last bit a bit charming at times. If your ego won't permit self-deprecation, however, which many people who chow down on ass-burgers appear to have a problem with, there are still better ways to phrase the above without coming across as an arrogant, contemptuous jackass:
- "In the end, you may not be communicating in same way as your audience and they will misunderstand you."
- "In the end, your audience may be coming at things from a different set of experiences and expectations.
What? Still not judgemental and self-aggrandizing enough? Try this on for size:
- "In the end, your audience may have missed a key point or two in what you wrote."
- "In the end, your audience may have overlooked context."
- "In the end, your audience may simply disagree with you, whether you think it justified or not."
That's seven alternative ways of saying what you said, seven alternatives I came up with off the top of my head (I literally spent five times the effort coming up with ways to insult you), with different emphases based on how prickly and/or fragile your own ego is, that doesn't make you come across as a contemptuous jackass. But you said this instead:
- "In the end, your audience can be stupid."
Are you saying I frame everything in a way that it serves my preset agenda? Like you?
No, I'm saying you frame everything in a way that makes you look like a contemptuous jackass. Try to keep up.
For those in the viewer audience, I framed things in the form that it will occur to you to underline that no matter how frustrated you are, there is a less troubled truth under there if you can get past all participants monocular vision of how people communicate.
Translation from ass-McDonald's to English: "I framed things in the form that comforts me by keeping me the smart one in my own mind at least while casually dismissing any disagreement as the product of stupid people."