Marginalizing a black person's opinions as "froth" really makes you seem like a wonderful human being, HR.
In no world is noting that posting a link as evidence of something that the link is nothing like or the exact opposite of marginalizing anything, it's pointing out that you're either wildly mistaken or trolling.
You can go two for two and grandstand about how I've failed to make any point whatsoever
I freely acknowledged more than one of your points. If not agreeing with all of them counts as grandstanding about your failures, regardless of you supporting some of those points with (again) links that entirely undercut those points, then I suppose you'd be right.
I have not been engaging in a debate - merely laying bare my own internal feelings about my condition, but, of course, you were too busy going for my throat.
I haven't been engaging in debate either, just discussion. That you can't tell the one from the other is another of those failures of yours I'm so keen on pointing out, I guess.
And, because it really bears mentioning more than just two times, the only thing I 'went for your throat' on was either an amazingly stupid mistake or you being a troll. Given how often you're the latter, how often you've reveled in being the latter, I erred on the side of you just being an asshole.
But you're either mistaken, or you're wrong, and that you can't even admit it's either of those things is just making you look like more of a troll.
Thanks. I appreciate you and your efforts. You imply there was something at stake here for me; I put it to you that you are wrong.
I would even go as far as to put it to you that I expected indifference and hostility in your response: since when have white people ever affirmed the hardship Afro-Americans and the African Diaspora experience?
Never. I'd be a fool to expect you to act otherwise.
So just trolling all the way down, then.
It was hardly as cut-and-dry as HR would have us think. I had been following that unfortunate woman's case since it made headlines.
I didn't say anything about anything being cut-and-dry, nor did I say anything about the woman's case. I pointed out that China's legal system is notoriously brutal to everyone and executions of both native citizens and foreigners accused of smuggling are notoriously out of control.
The article posted (nor any of the others I looked up before writing my reply) mentioned absolutely nothing, from anyone anywhere, about the execution being racially motivated. No accusations of China's bias against black skin or African descent, not even a passing mention of her being an outsider weighing in on one side or another.
The only thing that's 'cut and dried' is that the only assertion that this woman's execution had anything to do with the color of her skin or the continent of her origin, comes from Cirno. It's pretty fucking shitty to twist the bullshit execution of a human being so that it looks like it supports your argument, when it doesn't.
Did I miss anything, @Cirno? Because I looked, when you first posted it, because I had no idea there was any specific hostility against black people in China (outside of the general racism towards anyone who isn't Chinese) and wondered if maybe you just chose a bad link to support your point. And I looked again before posting this, because fuck maybe my google foo was poor, and I'm wrong. Does anyone except you mention anywhere on the internet that this woman's execution was motivated or complicated by the color of her skin? If they do, then fuck me, I will write up the most amazingly heartfelt apology to you.
But if not, fuck you for being such a disgusting little troll that you'd use a woman's execution just to provoke peole on a gaming forum.