@silverfox said in RL things I love:
@Aria
When I was a TA my professor gave me strict rules for grading and I followed them. He would then instruct them to come to him if they wanted to discuss their grades. 7/10 times he would raise their grade and the other 3/10 be all, "yeah, my TA got that right, your answer is way off."
I worked for a religion professor and I think he just enjoyed talking about his content matter.
Yeah, see, if this was just a question of answers being legitimately wrong, that's fair! I know I'm smart, but I'm not amazing. But this is like.....
On my last assignment, I got an 80.01% in a class where my lowest grade until then had been a 92%. I looked at the answer sheet after they released it and it turned out that the answer sheet the TA had put together was not only wrong, but wrong in such a way that their calculated answers for multiple questions make no sense and violate a basic principle of what we're studying. They ended up having to correct grades for the entire class by about 10-12%.
On my current assignment, I got a 77.75%, which is a 'C', but in grad school a 'C' is failing. The reason? There was a question about what the order winners (the thing that ultimately drives a customer to make a purchase) are where I said it was their low cost. The "correct" answer was their extreme manufacturing efficiency, because..... it allowed them to have the lowest cost. There was a three part question about priorities in each phase of this company's life cycle, with five potential priorities listed. I answered with the top priority for each phase. I get my grade back and it's all marked wrong for not identifying every possible priority among the five in each phase. That would be irritating but fine, except the professor said in his open office hours to choose the top priority. Those two question alone meant a 20% reduction for the entire assignment.
I'm not the only student in the class that's irritated right now. There's multiple people saying that not only are these grades the lowest grades that they've ever gotten on anything in the entire program, but that they're blindsided by the grades we get back every week. When something seems clear and easy to understand they bomb and when they think they don't understand something at all, their grade is fine. That seems like there's something fundamentally wrong, because it's one thing for a group of students to say they're having trouble understanding the material. It's another thing for a group of students to say they can't even gauge whether they understand the material week after week.
At this point, I'm starting to suspect that this course is considered one of the most difficult in my program not because the material is particularly complex or difficult to understand, but because expectations aren't clear. Either the professor and the TA aren't communicating, the TA isn't communicating to the grading team, or the TA doesn't understand the material well enough to create a reasonable grading rubric for the other team members to use.
I do not love any of that, but I do love the fact that enough students suspect there's something seriously wrong that we've started asking for them to release the average grade on every assignment. And since the TA has refused, we've all started talking to each other more and agreed to submit a lot of regrade requests so this reaches the professor's desk.
If we're all legitimately doing poorly, cool. School can be super hard. Believe me, I earned that B- in my computer programming courses. But if we're all doing poorly because one arrogant but mediocre dude has overestimated his ability, doesn't like being questioned about it, and is dicking around? Yeah. I'm glad I kicked off the "nah, bro, we're gonna fix this" riot.