MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. Arkandel
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 9
    • Topics 171
    • Posts 8075
    • Best 3388
    • Controversial 20
    • Groups 4

    Posts made by Arkandel

    • RE: General Video Game Thread

      @insomnia What I've been reading is that post-stat squish the entire process of leveling alts has been borked, as fights take way too long even at low levels (someone claimed his heirloom decked rogue was 2-4 shotting mobs at 25ish and now at 27 he needs double digits of hits to take them out).

      Thankfully I had already leveled up my new monk main so I didn't have to go through that stuff. But I'll definitely miss the WQGF - I think it will have a definite effect on classes/specs who can't solo content as well as others. For example pet classes and tanks have a large advantage now, especially as fresh max level characters.

      posted in Other Games
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • Inspiration material for your current game

      As the title says, what would be good reading/viewing material for whatever game you are on?

      Let's make this more fun and don't mention what material the game is 'formally' derived from ("Read Dracula for this Victorian Age VampMush") but what would actually inspire players ("Read The Light Fantastic for this MageMush").

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: General Video Game Thread

      @insomnia Why the panic? 😛

      posted in Other Games
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: General Video Game Thread

      @insomnia Phew, you scared me.

      posted in Other Games
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: General Video Game Thread

      @insomnia What? But... the candle... who take candle now?

      posted in Other Games
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: General Video Game Thread

      Ugh, World Quest Group Finder doesn't work any more, and it won't in the future either since Blizzard intentionally broke that functionality.

      RIP me 😞

      posted in Other Games
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: MSB, SJW, and other acronyms

      @auspice I feel objectified.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: MSB, SJW, and other acronyms

      @auspice said in MSB, SJW, and other acronyms:

      @arkandel said in MSB, SJW, and other acronyms:

      @auspice said in MSB, SJW, and other acronyms:

      Forum is not a game.

      Citation needed.

      Okay then:
      We are not developing a game. This post was mis-filed. Move it, dagnabit. Do not sully the filing system! 😛

      FINE!

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: MSB, SJW, and other acronyms

      @auspice said in MSB, SJW, and other acronyms:

      Forum is not a game.

      Citation needed.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • MSB, SJW, and other acronyms

      This isn't quite about game development but I wanted to post under this forum's umbrella anyway just to signal the fact the thread's content needs to remain constructive.

      It's in response to this:

      @lisse24 said in San Francisco.:

      @arkandel said in San Francisco.:

      'Silencing' doesn't happen very often here - moderation is pretty damn light. I've had to give a couple of warnings for personal attacks in non-Hogpit threads, and booted that one guy who was trolling every thread.

      I just want to point out that no matter how much, how little, or what sort of speech you moderate someone is going to be silenced. If you go full-SJW, you may end up silencing some people who have controversial views, or just those who are scared of speaking up for fear they'll say something wrong. If you let the classic internet "bro-mentality" rule, you sideline PoC, LGBTQ folk, and women, creating a hostile environment that effectively silences them. If you refuse to stamp out inflammatory speech, the people who like fights and drama for drama's sake will rule the day, and anyone who wants a reasonable discussion on an important topic will end up silenced and marginalized. I know I'm posting this in the hogpit and the decision about which type of speech to allow here was decided long ago, but the idea that no moderation means everyone gets to be heard is BS.

      And that's a fair point so I wanted us to discuss it.

      For starters a disclaimer; MSB has only two actual rules about moderation. You can't attack a person outside of the Hog Pit (attacking opinions is fine) and you can't be blatantly racist, misogynistic, etc.

      The general idea is to avoid going too far with sanitizing language, so for an actual 'formal' offense to happen there needs to be no question the rules were violated; it's the difference between "kill all Jews!" and "I don't like dealing with female staff". The first will get you into our shortlist for removal, the second makes you sound idiotic but unless it's persistent and it looks intentional (which is usually the case, as troll bait) we wouldn't intervene as administrators.

      This has at least a few effects:

      1. Just because you are permitted to be ignorant it doesn't mean ignorance is protected. In the scenario above, for example, you are going to get flamed... and you'll deserve it.

      2. Sometimes people use this clause to derail conversations just to be, well, shits. Slapping the comment in the middle of an otherwise tense but ongoing debate in the Mildly Constructive section, for instance, is pretty much guaranteed to move the thread to the Hog Pit within a few pages.

      3. The lines aren't always clear. There's a fair question about just how SJW-y we want this forum to be, especially as the mention of some words triggers people to different degrees; the easy example would be "bitch" or "cunt" used as insults. As it stands my inclination is to leave it in the 'endangered zone' area above; it can get you yelled at by posters, but unless you're doing it on purpose just to pick on people, it's not going to get you banned.

      4. Dealing in absolutes isn't just for the Sith; it also lets MSB admins moderate without requiring all of us to develop advanced groupthink. What I think is offensive and my life experiences and biases differ from @Auspice's or @Ganymede's as we look at a gray area, yet all three of us would nuke from orbit someone who promoted domestic violence. Do keep in mind administrators are also posters; just because we are rolling our eyes at you it doesn't mean you're in trouble (and it's on us to make the distinction clear).

      I'd like your opinions on this. Please remember to stay civil, if only to escape the meta-irony of a thread specifically meant to discuss it devolving into its own discussion material.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: MU Things I Love

      @tinuviel said in MU Things I Love:

      @botulism said in MU Things I Love:

      Running a game where things have an expiration date

      I definitely wish more games did this. In a way that people were definitely aware of such an expiration, of course.

      What's interesting is that the most game probably want to run indefinitely but they have a short shelf life anyway due to dwindling activity levels, which might have been improved if they had introduced the urgency of doing a limited run.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Mushing and Dating/Relationships

      Way I see it, people need to meet somewhere. Usually that involves their mutual hobbies or what they do for fun.

      Well...

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Open Sheets?

      @mietze said in Open Sheets?:

      Unfortunately what I think is much more likely to happen (at least this has been my experience) in heavy pvp with little to no staff attention is that people tend to hunt for the weakest looking person when they get bored and want to amuse themselves by pkill Or, they make sure their incoming friends (or their new pc) is built specifically to take out the person they have an ooc grudge hard on for.

      Yes. People are cowards.

      On HM - where XP accumulated endlessly and there was a real dino problem if I ever saw one - it happened all the time; oldbies would not only never target other oldbies, they would in fact d never even target people who had been around for a little while. Sure, the chances a 300 XP guy would take out your 800 XP one is small but if RNG goes the wrong way it could happen so fuck that; they bullied newbies instead.

      If not they would get a few of their friends over to intimidate the fuck out of that person or, of course, send in pages to tell them in a 'friendly' OOC way what a big mistake it would be to oppose them, you know, as a courtesy. We wouldn't want anything bad to happen, would we.

      posted in Game Development
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: A (Mildly Complete) List of Current Games

      @prototart said in A (Mildly Complete) List of Current Games:

      Between

      even ignore everything about how text is a super niche medium since, God, probably like Everquest I guess and how most people just age out of literally anything and honestly the rate here is probably like 10:1 exit:enter at this point

      and

      and it's still a deal w a community that's spent years sheltering time bombs and e-weinsteins cus "well they're fine with me" or "wow that's a friend of mine maybe you're the problem,"

      I must completely agree. My opinion on this is that we are very dismissive as a community to anything that doesn't match our personal, direct experiences.

      Folks ignore the fact ours is a shrinking hobby because they can personally get RP, or they've personally helped someone new get into playing (which is great, btw, don't get me wrong) despite how playerlists are becoming shorter and more games shut down than get opened.

      Similarly people these days get all up in arms now about some bad players ostricized by the community but they befriended and defended them in their hayday, ignoring tangible warnings to the contrary when it didn't fit their interests to take them more seriously.

      It's how we are, and that won't change. It's why I think sites like MSB, TMC, etc are important to have around just so we can look at our community as a whole outside of our own bubbles and maybe readjust our opinions based on others' experiences as well.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: The Basketball Thread

      @ganymede said in The Basketball Thread:

      I don't think it is a good move. I'm still trying to figure out the logic behind it.

      See, I interpret this the other way - that this is a hedged bet between competing and rebuilding.

      If Kawhi is who he was before the injury and he re-signs next year then, well, he's obviously a considerable upgrade over DeRozan.

      If he's not as good or he decides to leave then there's suddenly a lot of salary cap space (especially since Lowry and Valanciunas' contacts expire at that time) to go into a full rebuild.

      What I don't understand is why they didn't just trade DMDR for picks, straight-up... that part could be the hope that Kawhi himself might, somehow, pay off.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: The Basketball Thread

      @ganymede I think it's a really bad move.

      Demar had his issues but he was as loyal as it comes - he stayed with Toronto through its worse years, and he was a multiple time All Star. He loved the city. And the Raptors have issues getting players to want to come here... now we are trading the guy who did.

      Whether Kawhi stays (which is unlikely, since he said it himself) or goes it's a bad idea. I just hope they trade him to the Lakers for some young talent or picks instead of letting him simply walk in a year with nothing.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: General Video Game Thread

      A quick PSA for WoW players - your weekly chest contains 1000 Wakening Essences today (the price of a legendary item) whether you ran any Mythics+ last week or not.

      posted in Other Games
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Open Sheets?

      @faraday That's what I mean. Sheets, to me, mean numbers and not backgrounds.

      posted in Game Development
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Open Sheets?

      @sunny said in Open Sheets?:

      @cobaltasaurus

      How much PVP do you intend for there to be?

      I literally have no answer for 'games in general' beyond 'it depends'. Specifically for Sacred Seed, if you're planning on discouraging PVP completely, then I think Open Sheets are the best. If you're going to allow any PVP at all (including allowing for political action against one another for rank/reputation) then semi-open.

      I think full transparency is a great thing for PvP games as well - as it removes any appearance of wrongdoing, favoritism ("staff like X so they gave him more stuff"), etc.

      To put it a different way, a bad player will figure out a way to deduce information using OOC means one way or the other. They'll analyze someone's dice in PrPs, ask innocent sounding questions and file the answers away, etc.

      Open sheets ought to flatten the field and remove a vector I always thought was ineffective - the OOC masquerade - from the equation completely.

      posted in Game Development
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: RL Anger

      Cockygate.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • 1
    • 2
    • 109
    • 110
    • 111
    • 112
    • 113
    • 403
    • 404
    • 111 / 404