MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. Arkandel
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 9
    • Topics 171
    • Posts 8075
    • Best 3388
    • Controversial 20
    • Groups 4

    Posts made by Arkandel

    • RE: Game of Thrones

      Which Game of Thrones alumni do you think will have the better career going forward?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: The Basketball Thread

      @Ganymede Regular season Warriors. These guys don't care any more, they are too experienced to. They keep the switch for the playoffs.

      There are few things scarier in basketball than the Q3 Dubs.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: The Basketball Thread

      Being a Torontonian, I fucking hate Drake. What a miserable 'ambassador' for the city he is, showing zero class. A team lost, and he's taunting them right off the floor. Show some class.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: The Basketball Thread

      This was quite the grueling series, only to decide which team gets decimated by the Warriors.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: If you work hard, son, maybe someday you'll RP

      @Derp said in If you work hard, son, maybe someday you'll RP:

      I hate this word. It feels like such a cheap copout on a way to get around something obvious: "wrongfun" is a real thing.

      Yes, there is such a thing as wrongfun, and I think that we'd be a hell of a lot better off if we used it more, especially when it's not 'minor infraction that can be chalked up to quirkiness' and more 'no, you are seriously going way into the weeds with this'.

      Wrongfun may be used incorrectly but there's nothing wrong with the word itself.

      We're gaming. Gaming isn't there to serve an agenda; it's to have fun. That's the only relevant standard is that everyone is entertained.

      It's like thumbing your nose because people are watching soap operas instead of Breaking Bad. I mean sure, there's no denying BB is a masterpiece - but so what? The value of your entertainment - what you watch (or play) - doesn't determine your own worth in any real way.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: The Basketball Thread

      You know what really amuses me? How quickly the narrative shifts based on the most recent result.

      Do the Bucks drop one game to Boston? They can't handle teams with competent bigs.

      Do they crush Boston to pieces? They are the Next Big Thing and their only problem is whether they can keep this roster going forward.

      Do they win game 1 then smash the Raptors on game 2? They are slight favorites to beat the unstoppable Warriors (this was even before KD was injured!). And the Raptors? They are trash, Kwahi is gone for sure.

      Do the Raptors win games 3 to 5? Kawhi stays, Giannis is one-dimensional, an one-trick pony really. Is he even an MVP caliber player if he can't win in the playoffs at age 23 in his team's first playoffs run in 35 years?

      Man.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      @Warma-Sheen ***=To be honest this part is a month old now so I'm not sure we should be protecting it with spoiler tags any more but***

      click to show

      ... the official justification is we wouldn't see it coming if anyone but Jon Snow killed the Night King. It's as simple as that.

      If we did want to break it down though past that, different characters tried more direct approaches and they simply didn't work. Jon took several shots through military force or challenging him personally and he was pushed back each time - the NK wasn't interested in fighting him directly. Fuck that noise. Then Theon charged him directly (I think his was the biggest 'name' who attacked him) and he was stomped into the ground.

      Arya just chose to do it from behind, assassin-style. That's her way. We can argue why none of them saw her, where she came from, all of that... but it's an explanation. Given a little bit more of a setup they could have sold it much better, too.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: The Basketball Thread

      The thing about Giannis is he absolutely needs his shooters to hit those shots. It's how the entire synergy works on offense - they spread the floor and then he forces defenses to make an impossible choice; double/triple team him and accept open jumpers or spread out and get dunked on every single time?

      Unless Middleton, Ilyasova, Lopez etc become the threats (and Bledsoe is a non-factor in this series, so far) the Bucks could be in trouble. But if they do...

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Random links

      The Land of Clichea

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • What do you eat?

      Do we have vegetarians or vegans in our midst?

      What do you guys think about Impossible Foods and manufactured meat in general?

      Let's talk food habits more under the scope of how it relates to social or health issues than just what we like to shove into our mouths.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: RL things I love

      So I'm part of this very technical team of people at work most of whom are complete introverts; nice people and easy to get along with but they don't often talk about themselves at all, don't enjoy going out for lunch, socializing, having small talk... as a result I don't know much about many of my immediate coworkers at all outside of a professional environment. It's fine, as I associate liberally with folks from other teams so it's not a big deal.

      But the other day one of my team members told me he would start coming to our weekly basketball runs since they had finally made daycare arrangements for him, and asked if I could give him a ride to the court, which I was happy to do. On the way there, just to chat about something and fill the silence I asked if he was watching Game of Thrones.

      He goes "yeah, but I'm not sure what they are planning to do about the prophecies from the House of the Undying. At least I hope the valonqar part will prove to be important."

      Okay, what the fuck? It turns out the guy has read almost every book I like, plays D&D (wtf?) and watches the same shows. We've been working together for two years and I had no clue - and he did know, so argh, why not say something so we can bond over nerdy shit? Come oooon man! He didn't even avoid the issue, it just didn't occur to him to say anything unless directly approached about it.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Good or New Movies Review

      @ZombieGenesis I have... no desire to watch Aladdin.

      It seems summoned entirely out of nostalgia and greed. That's not a combination I'm very fond of - but I'll be happy to be proven wrong.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      @Sparks All I wanted was Dunc and Egg. In fact it'd be so great because the time period isn't tremendously different and the budget could be held to reasonable levels - no dragons, no grand armies crushing into each other, just the brutal realities of Westeros seen through some young eyes.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Incentives for RP

      @Thenomain said in Incentives for RP:

      I log into an RP game to RP.

      It's a complex problem. For example in MMORPGs there are many people who want the gear raiding provides but don't like to raid. However unless they raid the gear isn't useful.

      So why do they want it?

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Incentives for RP

      @Lotherio said in Incentives for RP:

      My question is more, must everything be XP oriented incentive wise or are there other incentives that could work that are less, well, gamey to me. @Tinuviel made a great comment, it takes more work and XP is easier to hand out.

      The issue here is many games (most, really) are inadvertently painting themselves into a corner by not giving any other of mechanical reward than XPs, thus making them the only reward possible.

      That's often because their systems are derived from table-top systems which don't require any other progression ladders, but for MU* there are so many possibilities. Some modern games have 'action points' of one sort or other to signify how a character spends their free time, there can be resources of various kinds (which a human GM can't micromanage but a computer certainly can), etc.

      So sometimes XPs are all you can give your players, but that's because you didn't build a game around the idea of anything else existing that you can reward them with.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: If you work hard, son, maybe someday you'll RP

      @faraday I've found (and obviously YMMV) that the use of tools like those is cultural. In some games they are commonly employed and it's nearly a no-brainer, and in others few players even know that they exist.

      One way to do it is to incentivize them. For example games like Arx explicitly make it 'profitable' to play with new people (they have a flag, basically, that offers free XPs if they +recc others).

      But other times it just... happens, organically, and people use the tools coded for this purpose. I don't know why since the syntax is usually very similar and fairly simple in all those games.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: If you work hard, son, maybe someday you'll RP

      @Sparks As @Thenomain often repeats like the cranky old man he is, code can't solve social issues.

      The code facilitates, that's all.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Real World Peeves, Disgruntlement, and Irks.

      @surreality said in Real World Peeves, Disgruntlement, and Irks.:

      @Ghost More amusingly, a friend of mine from MUing, about... 12 years ago? Got a cruise for two as part of a thank you from the company where she'd done some consulting.

      Unless you're getting invited by friends to more vacations than average, I know the one in question and she was pretty awesome. I wonder if she's still MU*ing it out somewhere.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      ***=First of all I completely agree with the sentiment about Jon's parentage***

      click to show

      ... being completely irrelevant within this season. It's mentioned, it's played up but ultimately - like a lot that has to do with Jon - it amounts to exactly nothing. When the actual question of succession comes up no one even brings it up! I'm not claiming that's the only or deciding factor but you'd think it'd be at least an option given how many people from that very gathering had spent entire episodes telling each other Jon was the best option!

      But they did so little with the character. The entire storyline about the White Walkers flowed around him without the character truly affecting it much this season; his involvement could have well ended by bringing Daenerys into the fold. Sure, Arya getting the Night King kill is a perfectly legitimate way to go (even though to her story this all thing was a sidequest at best), but couldn't they have at least thrown him a bone and let him slay the undead dragon? I mean Viserion self-destructed ten seconds later anyhow, they could have written that in for one of their main characters.

      One other thing. I was reading the transcript of an Emilia Clarke interview in which she says one the objectives for her downfall was to make the viewer feel guilty for rooting for her when she was only murdering a bunch of people we didn't care about or liked. So we were okay when she was (literally!) crucifying nobles who stood for slavery - or just didn't do anything to stop it - but now we're scandalized?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      @Sparks It might even be fair to say the Doom of Valyria might be a fairly well known event in Westeros whose exact nature we - the readers/viewers - are simply not privy because it was never revealed to us.

      But 300 years or so is nothing for such a major event 's cause to already have passed into legend, especially to Maesters and the like. Plus the Targaryen royalty would have certainly had it extensively documented since it's such a vital part of their past.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • 1
    • 2
    • 68
    • 69
    • 70
    • 71
    • 72
    • 403
    • 404
    • 70 / 404