MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. Arkandel
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 9
    • Topics 171
    • Posts 8075
    • Best 3388
    • Controversial 20
    • Groups 4

    Posts made by Arkandel

    • RE: Game of Thrones

      ***=So after watching last night's episode but also reading a ***

      click to show
      lot of threads on this show, just a couple of observations.

      The producers really like their big set pieces. I mean they really do, to the point of distraction sometimes which isn't so bad, but they are depriving us of some subtler moments in the greater picture.

      For example I would have really liked to see the Starks girls' reactions to finding out the greatest secret their family had ever kept. It was significant dammit, they all grew up thinking the most honorable man they knew had cheated on their mom and as it turns out... not so much. And their relationship with Jon, how does that affect it? We don't know because they didn't show it, and unless there's an Arya/Jon crossover in the last two episodes (with a huge battle somewhere in the middle) we might not have time to see any of it.

      But also the writers don't seem to care as much for the subtler forces out there. In a way we saw that with Littlefinger, too; at some point near season... six? He was kind of reduced to a monologue-spouting villain and his power seemed to be the Vale - which isn't true.

      But in this season it was also shown in the discrepancy between what the interwebs expected from the Night King plotline's resolution (some kind of mystical significance involving Bran, a fulfillment of prophecies, something to do with greater powers at play - hell, even time travel was mentioned) and yet in the director's interview right after Episode 3 he spelled it out for us; Arya killed the Night King because it would surprise the audience. That's it, there was no more thought than that - we put way more thought into it than they did. The writers don't read subreddits or subscribe to theories; they just have deadlines and checkboxes to fill out, and big battle scenes seem to be where they're at.

      The weird thing - for me - is they have a pretty good handle on secondary characters. Tyrion's dialogues with Varys, how Brienne and Jaime's story was shamed, various reunions around the first two episodes of season 8 were all pretty stellar. But I don't know they have as good a grip on Jon with Dany, for example, who are often... well, basically they come out as being pretty fucking dumb, and I'm not sure that's intentional. And I'm not even talking about couch-tactician analysis of battle strategies or anything.

      Two more to go!

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Random links

      I didn't know about this but apparently bicycles were a huge thing for women's rights? I suspect there might be some hyperbole involved in the article though.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      @Ghost Yeah but put that behind spoiler tags please.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      @Rinel I wonder if we actually need a spoiler for this since we're just speculating, but maybe just so anyone who hasn't watched yet doesn't have to know these things are still being speculated.

      ***=So...***

      click to show

      See, one of the things I liked about the books was the veil of mystery behind supernatural events and threats. I love GoT but I think I'd feel cheated if they didn't some kind of resolution instead of 'leaving it to the viewers' which I'd consider a real cop-out.

      We don't need to be hand-fed everything but these are some plotlines we've been fed for some times integral to the saga and I really hope they don't leave them dangling. I mean sure, if we squint hard enough - and I mean we'd need to do some serious fucking squinting we can figure out why Arya fits them, but it'd be as good a fit as squeezing Hot Pie into being Azor Ahai as well.

      I'd really rather have an "ah HAH" moment before episode 8 wraps up.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      ***=Do you think...***

      click to show

      ... the show will do anything with all the prophecies? Will we get a somewhat solid answer about The Prince Who Was Promised or Azor Ahai, or will they resort to a cop-out ("it's all up to interpretation, you guys!") given the time frame of the remaining episodes?

      Also I'm wondering if it will all play out straight from now on. Like, is Cleganebowl and Cersei vs the Starks/Targaryens what's left or do they have any real twists left?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Real World Peeves, Disgruntlement, and Irks.

      @Tinuviel I thought you wrote Reuters should respond appropriately to threats of violence, and I wondered if there was a scandal I missed.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      @Ghost said in Game of Thrones:

      Man, I am such a Lena Headey fan. She's really brought out the character and is the perfect Cersei.

      Watch Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles. Man, I miss that show.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Space Games and Travel Time? Why? Why Not?

      @faraday Oh, sure, if staff went ahead and made Manhattan (or Zonix 6) a viable place to play away from their 'home' then they can't complain the playerbase is spread out.

      But although I think that's a bad choice to make, it's still a choice for game makers.

      posted in MU Questions & Requests
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Space Games and Travel Time? Why? Why Not?

      At some point it's down to players to not be idiots about it and not about space travel. If you're in a D&D campaign and you continuously split the party up just to travel you're probably not being a good sport, and if you're on a Mage game set in Maine but you and your buddies spend most of the time living in Manhattan then why are you even on that game?

      It's the same thing for sci-fi. There shouldn't need to be artificial barriers keeping you to a certain geographical location - just the reasonable OOC obligation to be a responsible player who contributes to the MU*. Games are free to play, the least we can do in return is make our characters available for others to meet.

      posted in MU Questions & Requests
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Space Games and Travel Time? Why? Why Not?

      @Ghost said in Space Games and Travel Time? Why? Why Not?:

      I personally find "this sector only" to heavily hinder the space sci-fi genre. It's also very hard to justify only remaining in one sector when you're flying around in ships with hyperdrives.

      It's not trivial to strike a good balance between allowing the universe as your players' playground (which is fun) and splitting up the playerbase too thin so you can't ever find RP outside of your immediate social circles since everyone else is on a different planet/solar system (which is less fun).

      I agree with @Lotherio that these things need to be set up from scratch. For example just because you may go everywhere you goddamn please and have all kinds of whacky adventures there, there's a thematic reason why the actual PCs keep returning/hanging out primarily at a certain 'home' turf. But that, to emphasize the part, is not effortless and it won't happen unless it's made that way.

      posted in MU Questions & Requests
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Space Games and Travel Time? Why? Why Not?

      I guess I was never into sci-fi for roleplaying purposes although I read a lot of it and I certainly enjoy science fiction movies and shows.

      The sole exception to that is playing Force users because lightsabers.

      posted in MU Questions & Requests
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      Moar art (this time without a spoiler warning)

      rif-1556793066053 (1).jpg

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      @Kestrel And frankly - no need to use spoilers for this one - the show has established pretty well if not explicitly said it that Jon Snow isn't uh, a genius. He's not a military prodigy, there are probably several swordsmen I can name on the show (and at least one swordswoman) who could beat him straight up. He's at best a passable politician since he's not even trained in that - there was never a need for it, since he was supposed to have served on the Wall for the rest of his life.

      In other words one of the shows (and books') most major characters has a crapload of weaknesses. Those don't make him worse as a character, they make him better because he's still vital - because he has other qualities people look up to, and he inspires loyalty in others just like his father/uncle did before him.

      If anything else I'm more annoyed about Cersei sitting on the Iron Throne because they haven't shown her to possess almost any positives. Those (in the books) were her kids; she was fiercely protective of them - that's something. On the show she had a backbone, as we saw during that SHAME scene but other than that she's been a terrible leader and... well, person end to end. She barely mourned for the son she drove to suicide. And that's a bit one dimensional, there's no way to root for her.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: SerenityMUSH - Discussion

      @SerenityMush said in SerenityMUSH - Discussion:

      No reset has been done on the game in recent years, and doing so would require a conversation with the other game admins. Some of the long-standing, overpowered players are gone, and some still exist but don't really play any more.

      I don't know anything about your game but it sounds like it's been going on for a while which, in a way, might be one of its strengths; longevity encourages nostalgia and loyalty, both of which are very good traits for any MU*, especially since the shelf life for most is very limited.

      I'd be pretty careful with resets since it might mess with that. That doesn't mean you can't do some spring cleaning - code updates, new features, etc - but if too much changes too soon you might as well start a new MU*, and... again, shelf life. You probably don't want to alienate your existing and returning players by making them look at the result and not care any more.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      @insomniac7809 Try now for the second image. 🙂

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Health and Wealth and GrownUp Stuff

      The wince from my coworker who's fifteen years younger and eight centimeters taller, when he realized I was the one defending him in our basketball run tonight.

      Hell yeah, it's kind of silly-competitive because who cares about this stuff, but it still makes me feel like the work I put in is paying off.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      ***=Sorrynotsorry because so much cool new art and memes to post. ***

      click to show
      🙂

      dda43c46-41aa-4132-8951-67e9707ff351-image.png

      Kingslayers of Westeros:

      9c88a274-422a-413f-9a20-973950024ae4-image.png

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      @bored Oh, one more thing I just responded to a buddy of mine on FB posting (spoilers to anyone who visits the link) this YouTube analysis from a strategic point of view.

      My takeaways from it:

      1. This is a TV series, not a tactical simulation. Spending 20 minutes to discuss fantasy-military siege strategy is missing the point by... a lot. This isn't an RTS game.

      2. Comments like "I still enjoy it but..." just baffle me. But what? What the hell...? What do people want more than enjoyment? Life-long fulfillment?

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      ***=I read an interview by the episode's director...***

      click to show

      ... who also did some of the series' most esteemed episodes like Hardhome and Battle of the Bastards. He basically said (I'm mildly paraphrasing) he intentionally didn't set it up more for Arya so we wouldn't see her coming, so instead of placing more emphasis on her he had us follow Jon around the battlefield being teased with a direct confrontation between him and the Night King.

      I mean in retrospect I'd have also preferred if he had thrown us a bone here. Maybe some parkour in the background eagle-eyed viewers could spot her in, a last second face-shift from where she pretended to be some dead guard. But there were many moments in the episode where the narrative wasn't detailed, perhaps in the interest of simplicity or because it was all so packed with all kinds of logistics it became overwhelming; how many times did we see Brienne or Jaime pinned against walls by multiple wights without being shown just how they survived the bind?

      What I'm saying is I agree there were weak points that could have been done better.

      But I mean the fucking magnitude of what they pulled off in the episode - can we agree it was impressive? I mean even not for just TV? They had aerial dragon-versus-dragon fights, for a solid ten minutes it was raining zombies in Winterfell, they had cavalry charges, one on one fights, catapults hurling fireballs. That's some badass scenes. They are also not going to be coming to our TVs again any time soon by any other show, and I think we'll miss them when they're gone.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      ***=From Yahoo! right now...***

      click to show

      "Game of Thrones kills even more immigrants and it's a problem"

      Sigh.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • 1
    • 2
    • 74
    • 75
    • 76
    • 77
    • 78
    • 403
    • 404
    • 76 / 404