I scrolled back through the thread to see where or if @faraday was being dogpiled because I wasn't reading the thread that way at all, and it made me wonder if that comment was referring to my one specific comment @ them. What I saw was @Pandora propose this idea and the vast majority of responses saying 'nah that's not necessary'. I upvoted the OP when I first read it, then went on with my life and came back a few days later to some confusion, because I'd assumed there'd be a unanimous +1 consensus and evidently that was not the case. Otherwise I wouldn't have bothered posting at all because I wouldn't have assumed my voice would add anything to the discussion that wasn't already being said.
I was wrong, and I saw a lot of people agreeing with @faraday, so felt the need to back the underdog.
To clarify I have a lot of respect for @faraday. I have no idea what she does/doesn't do on her games to ensure things run smoothly, as I haven't played a game she's staffed, so can only base my responses on what was said on this thread.
In particular, this —
@faraday said in Personal Agency for Personal Boundaries:
@Pandora My policy is simple: Work it out amongst yourselves. If you can't or aren't comfortable doing so, contact staff to help mediate.
— I take some issue with as criticism of @Pandora's proposal.
Whether intended or not, the phrasing of this policy, as expressed here in particular, can come across as pretty victim-blamey. I can only speak for myself that it wouldn't in any way encourage me to come forward with any complaints I had, because it implies that doing so isn't the adult thing to do, and makes me somehow lesser. It also puts the person complaining on equal footing in staff's eyes with the person they're complaining about, as a baseline.
Operating from a position of 'innocent until proven guilty', this makes perfect sense. In the case of most existing systems, you don't know what happened, your job is to find out and treat the situation without bias to start.
What @Pandora is proposing is a lot more clear-cut and I would feel much more comfortable coming forward under such a system, because it would mean all I have to say to staff is 'I used red and they continued', which is an explicit rule violation that doesn't require any kind of mediation or consideration, in theory. It gives me the immediate upper hand should I complain. The problem-player in this case is plainly evident.
A while ago a friend told me they got banned on Arx for sexist behaviour. I was surprised by this news because they'd never displayed sexist behaviour anywhere I'd personally seen (and I'm one of those diabolical loud-mouthed feminists you hear so much about from insecure men). But I wasn't there, I don't know what happened, and accept that maybe they behave totally different around me vs. around others. If they'd told me something like 'someone used a flag that means I'm supposed to cut that shit out but I just couldn't help myself', I wouldn't have to wonder whether anyone was being reasonable in accusing him or just jumping the gun.