MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. Killer Klown
    3. Posts
    K
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 1
    • Posts 242
    • Best 101
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Killer Klown

    • RE: Cyberrun

      @Ghost I would too, truth be told; but I think SR is being hobbled by the business <or lack thereof> behind the scenes. It was bad before, but Catalyst labs is a shitshow in the best of circumstances; and they got it after it had already gone through the wringer from Wizkids to Fanpro to freaking Topps.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: Cyberrun

      @Ghost said in Cyberrun:

      @Admiral CP2077 might reinvigorate the genre on film and prompt Shadowrun to up their A-game.

      Or put Shadowrun in a coffin. Who knows. You're right, though. CP2077 will boom and draw interest to the genre.

      I used to like Shadowrun more than CP, hands down - up until about SR3rd edition. 4th was ok, but it really went downhill after FASA went under. At this point, I'd be just as happy to see it buried.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: Lifehacks

      Order. Order. Order. My brain wants to compartmentalize and structure everything - so I let it. I have things arranged around the house so that I have to do things in a certain sequence, otherwise something feels off and I realize I missed something.

      As far as food? A Foodsaver is my best friend. Finally broke down and got an InstaPot a couple of weeks ago and have been loving it, but we've had a Foodsaver for several years and I couldn't live without it. Plan out two or three meals for the week, buy groceries based on those plans; then spend a few hours over the weekend cooking. Some stuff gets stir fried, some in the InstaPot, some stewed or curried - each one enough for a couple of meals. Divide up whatever is made into separate vacuum bags and freeze them, then heat them up during the week after work - basically, make your own TV dinners.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: Harry Potter: Wizards Unite

      I've been poking at it, but don't really play all that much. There are some issues that I hope they manage to shake out - like, I miss my adventure sync, and the game tends to be really laggy which means that it fails to update my location, then suddenly bursts me to a new place and assumes that I was driving - thereby not crediting distance walked.

      posted in Other Games
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: GMs: Typical Player/GM Bad Habits

      Always, as a player or GM, plan to fail forward. This is probably the single most important thing I learned from the Wrath and Glory rules - and I cannot say enough how awesome that system is <even if you're not into 40k, the mechanics rock>. A failure is not a failure. It shouldn't stonewall or stop the scene until the players find a solution to the problem , or engineer a way around the problem. Failures should have consequences that go beyond everyone throwing dice at the issue until someone makes it- but they should be consequences in game; and they still can be used to move the story forward albeit not in the way the players might expect and would likely make the journey onward a bit more difficult.
      I've seen too many games break because the players either can't figure out something, or they just can't make the roll necessary to do it in-character. I've also seen too many plots hinge on a character making a critical roll - and if they don't, they miss out on a crucial piece of information and cannot move forward, or they just keep rolling until they eventually make it. Some things don't get a retry. Some things logically shouldn't get a retry; but that doesn't mean they should be a hard stop.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: Echoes in the Mists - Discussion

      @Alamias You know, they do allow Tzimisce there as a HRed bloodline.
      So that's probably more (in)appropriate

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: Critters!

      alt text

      His name is Dyson, because he is round and rolls about and picks up stuff. He is currently in jail because his street name is 'DontEatThat'

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: King of Sex Mountain

      @surreality Yeah, most of the LARPS around here in that timeperiod were one of two things - a sponsored 'club' in HS or university, or held as part of a local Gaming Convention. Pretty much it was 'excuse to have sex with some gaming involved' than the other way around.

      posted in Game Development
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: King of Sex Mountain

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again - back in the days when MUSHing was new <early 90s> and WoD Larps weren't really a thing yet, a friend of mine made the comment that if tabletop games were like Mushes, then all the players would lie around all day having sex with one another until the GM jumped out of a closet and yelled for them to roll initiative.

      Nothing I've seen in the last 25+ years has disproved this in the slightest; so... why not?

      posted in Game Development
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: If you work hard, son, maybe someday you'll RP

      @Derp Yes; and the other thing to remember is that not all staff are going to be the movers/shakers/shapers/npc runners. There's always going to be a number of folks who's sole purpose is to keep the game running under the hood - handling xp spends, build requests, general player questions and what have you. These people are responsible for making sure the game remains up and running but don't really have any decision making capabilities for the game as a whole. They're providing a necessary service, usually for nothing in return.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: If you work hard, son, maybe someday you'll RP

      I don't know. Maybe it's just me, but it seems like the idea of multi-sphere games tend to do more harm than good when it comes to activity. Some of the most successful or active games I can think of over the last twenty years or so focused on one sphere <not counting Mortal or Mortal+>. I know people want to play all the things, but that puts a pretty huge burden on staff - they need to know the rules, have the code in place, and have storytellers available for however many spheres are being supported. In the event of cross-sphere stories, you need to have both a staffer that knows all the spheres involved running the scene, and have the scene set up in such a way where one sphere won't tromp all over what would be a decent challenge for others.
      And that's assuming you get the spheres willing, and have a reason, to interact in the first place. A multisphere game where every one of the spheres is only involved in their own thing isn't a multisphere game, it's multiple games running on the same site.
      I guess, ideally, what I would prefer seeing is a game that focuses on one sphere and builds a solid plot and foundation; then, if the interest and support is there, branch out to another sphere. Staffers as a whole are fewer and further between, and it seems that straight up storytelling staffers are even rarer. That's a finite resource, and trying to spread it out over what basically amounts to multiple games at the same time only seems to result in burnout, high turnover, and no one getting the amount of attention they need.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: What do you eat?

      Y'all know that trope about kids acting out to be different from their parents just for the sake of being different from their parents? My family for uncountable generations back are Hindu.
      So, of course I honor the sacred cow with a side of fries whenever I can. I'll eat most anything you put in front of me, and I'll likely try it a second time just in case the first sampling was not a good representation. About the only thing I can't do are eggs - due to an allergy more than personal choice <which makes other aspects of life, like vaccinations and anesthetic, tricky>

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      @Lotherio said in Game of Thrones:

      @Roz said in Game of Thrones:

      @Killer-Klown said in Game of Thrones:

      So, yeah. I've been considering a few things - some of which have already been mentioned:
      ***=Stuff and things and whatnot***

      click to show

      2- Arya. Arya's ending was not great, but at least it felt more earned than Brans. After Ned's death, she became somewhat rootless and bounced from thing to thing; first in Essos, then Westeros. She started with a list, ammended that list, then eventually just dropped that list. She's a character in progress, so her moving on made more sense than not.

      ***thar be spoilers ofc***

      click to show

      I didn't like Arya's ending, tbh. Like yeah, it'd be cool to see her running off and having adventures. BUT. I felt like so much of her arc over the course of the show was trying to get back to family, trying to find her pack once more. And then she got back and they helped each other and now she is...leaving to go be alone again? The lone wolf dies, the pack survives, so now I guess it's time for Arya to go off solo??? Idk, I disagree that it made more sense than not.

      ***=Agreed and maybe the writers broke her ending some***

      click to show

      The going west was odd, its like reading LotR. Valyrian Doom was mentioned, but this is like the final nail in the coffin. Bran doesn't join the roots and become some weirwood in the massive network of weirwood roots under Westeros (the druidic database). So its like magic ended, so someone had to sail west in the tradition of 'this is the end of this age'.

      I think they ended there because the choose not to include her pack. Nymeria and the wolf pack is still around in the south. For all we know, if the books end up with closed north (North Kingdom and Jon's North North), she may end up more hanging out with the wolves than the people, or any number of other endings that isn't Bilbo sailing off to chronicle more of his life with the elves.

      ***=Yah. I do tend to agree***

      click to show

      I think she fell victim to so much else this season - where they had an idea and maybe something they wanted to execute, but didn't give it enough time or attention given everything else that was going on. It seems to me that they were setting Arya up to be the archtypical 'lone wolf', as you alluded to with her being away from her pack. Like just about every story, they spent several seasons building a slow burn - then had everything happen abruptly at once towards the end. Arya always ... didn't fit in. Whenever she found someplace to call home, it was either taken from her or she decided it didn't work for her. It started when she came down with daddy to Kings Landing... and we all know how that turned out. She hooked up with the Faceless Men, decided she didn't want to be one. She hung out with the Actors for a while, but that didn't last. She went on her own to murder down her List, until Sandor showed her what that path led to. She played at being the Chibi God of Death, until she saw the faces of it in Winterfell and Kings Landing and decided to Nope her way the hell out. As I mentioned above, she was probably the only character I can see who's not at, or near, the end of her arc. She's still evolving, still trying to find herself - but I don't think the show did a good job of portraying that here. It was a slow burn that suddenly exploded into a rapidfire series of beats with no real pacing.

      I have to wonder if that has something to do with the way they were trying to handle security. From what I understand they had the actors shoot multiple endings so that even they didn't know what the real one was. That takes a lot of time and resources; which given the givens, is time and resources spent on effectively useless and pointless material - instead of devoting them to something that could advance or mature the plot. We already heard that animating Ghost was too expensive to use him much, so obviously their resources weren't infinite - I wonder how well the season would've gone if they hadn't wasted so much on keeping it a secret, and concentrated more on making it the best it could've been.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      So, yeah. I've been considering a few things - some of which have already been mentioned:
      ***=Stuff and things and whatnot***

      click to show

      Endings:
      -For the most part, the Starks got exactly what they wanted and were put exactly where they needed to be. From least to most
      1- Bran. Ok, so... uh. Why? This is the reason I have the 'for the most part' disclaimer up there, because as presented in the show it doesn't make a damn lick of sense. I guess there's argument for wisdom and his namesake of Bran the Builder and such, but most every other in-show argument for this fell kind of flat.
      2- Arya. Arya's ending was not great, but at least it felt more earned than Brans. After Ned's death, she became somewhat rootless and bounced from thing to thing; first in Essos, then Westeros. She started with a list, ammended that list, then eventually just dropped that list. She's a character in progress, so her moving on made more sense than not.
      3- Jon. Most everything this season pointed to Jon's ending in one way or another. Tormund telling him that he's got the North in him; the real north was one hint, and him being sent to the wall when the Nights Watch wasn't really a thing anymore was another. He, historically, has always been one of the most honest people in the series - because he always says that him being leader would be a terrible idea. Then people make him leader. And he makes some of the most colossally bad decisions possible, thereby proving he had no business being leader. And the next time a catastrophe comes up? They make him leader again - because, hey, he survived the last one. When he was riding through, I thought at first he was just escorting the wildlings - then it hit me; first, why would they need an escort? It's their land. Second, when the Watch sends rangers, they go in groups - and he was the only one there. So, I'm guessing he's moving in with them - probably to become the next Mance Rayder. Because he doesn't want to be.
      4- Sansa. Sansa's probably got the best character arc in the series, I think. She started off as wanting nothing more than to be a Princess in Westeros and marry an Prince and eat lemon cakes and ... yeah. And she hated being at Winterfell and how crude people were there. As the series progressed, she learned how terrible people could be, how dishonest, and ultimately her one goal was to return home to Winterfell; and she began to be very protective of the people under her charge there. I don't agree that she should have had the Iron Throne <or ... Iron slagpile, I guess> for reasons that she herself said in the last episode; even though Bran was a Stark, and ostensibly the heir to the house, the Northern Lords would not follow him if he was King of the Seven Six Kingdoms. The same would have gone for Sansa, for those same reasons. By separating the North, she didn't just free them - she liberated them. She gave them a ruler they would be willing to follow.

      Dany... her arc was rushed, but it wasn't unexpected. She'd always had those tendencies - and like Tyrion said, no one complained because she only did it to people they didn't like. So long as folks agreed with her things were hunky-dory, but anyone who didn't... She also had a history of burninating unarmed opponents, from the slavers at Mereen, to the Lannister prisoners last season. It's just that they compressed so much this season that they didn't spend any time at all developing it properly. There are hints and one-notes, but no real fluid progression.

      Jon being Targaryen? As much as I could figure, the only relevance this had was ... it made him stop bonking his aunt? Which, I guess, triggered her inability to deal with rejection and turned her into a literal flaming hose beast? That's about as much worth as the show put on it, anyway.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      ***=Think a thought about a thunk***

      click to show

      Bronn shows up in Kings Landing after everyone else moves off
      Looks around, no one is there
      Grabs a reasonably sound chair, climbs the highest pile of rubble and sets it down
      Sits on it
      'Dis mine now.'

      End scene, end series.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: What's your nerd origin story?

      @Lotherio And hobos. We really can't dismiss the 'hobo' part of our murderhobo genealogy

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: What's your nerd origin story?

      Hey, we can be both. I mean, when LARPing came around we had to come out of our basements and force ourselves on the rest of the world...

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: What's your nerd origin story?

      @Goldfish said in What's your nerd origin story?:

      Looking back, my uncle and I, were kinda blazing a trail for nerdy black people. Like, I was a weirdo outcast so the kids can do the same today and be appreciated for it. 😋

      I actually said almost this same thing to a friend of mine a couple of months back; don't look at the younger generation and think they're less into the fandom because they didn't have to endure the ridicule and ostracism that we did, or having to look high and low for a store that sold the kind of books we wanted, scrimping and saving on the odd chance we would find the gaming materials we needed, or what have you; look at it in the light of us having to go through all that so future generations wouldn't have to.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: What's your nerd origin story?

      I've got three generations of engineer in me (Structural, mechanical, and electrical). My dad <electrical> was going for his masters when I was a kid in the late 70s'/early 80s; so I always had breadboards, vacuum tubes, relays and copper-etched circuit boards lying around the house. I just remember thinking the relays and tubes were really cool looking - like little cities or buildings under glass. I remember he once pulled a cathode ray tube out of an old TV (Which involved, I shit you not, shooting the screen with a bb gun until it shattered - did I mention my family are basically South American rednecks?) and let me play with it. Plus he got me watching re-runs of Star Trek.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      K
      Killer Klown
    • RE: Free Star Trek RPGs(Lasers & Feelings, Far Trek, WNMHGB)

      @Auspice Hey, I once played in a Shadowrun game where the PC's broke out the original D&D Basic set and started a game to kill time in game. It all went well until the ork mercenary flipped the table and went off grumbling about racial profiling.

      posted in Other Games
      K
      Killer Klown
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 12
    • 13
    • 3 / 13