Yeah, that’s kind of the vibe I’m getting too, to be honest.
I read the logs. I see nothing wrong. I see two people wanting to play an edgy romance with broken people, and two players who were clearly consenting to what was going down.
Apparently, out of the blue, Isaac feels uncomfortable — even though he continues with the RP and even suggests going further than what was previously suggested?
There’s definitely something missing here.
Pure Conjecture Follows
I will say that during my times with Cobalt, it would not at all surprise me if what went down was something closer to this:
Cobalt is interested in Isaac. Cobalt expresses that interest. Isaac reciprocates but is also doing so with various other people, which Cobalt finds out about and takes offense to. Cobalt confronts Isaac, who throws @Macha under the bus by saying how he thought it would be fine but now it’s all weird and stuff, and so Cobalt instantly goes on the offensive, declaring him an undeserved victim of harassment and removing the impediment to her amorous desires problem player. She then finds out about others, and suddenly her ‘victim of harassment’ is ‘on a ban watchlist for harem building’, because that’s the only way to save face at that point.
This dude is very clearly not a victim of anything, unless you count unusual verb tense choices. There’s definitely something more. And, as I said, the above is pure conjecture, but it tracks with historical precedent, so it would not at all surprise me.
Take it all with a huge grain of salt. I think that sufficient receipts have been provided to disprove the theory that he was the innocent victim of harassment and that Macha is some kind of monstrous boogeyman, personally, but you do you.
