@Arkandel said:
@Apos Another case scenario would be this (also pretty common):
A, B and C are playing... it's A's turn.
C says OOC "hey, skip me for a few, cat's on fire".
A poses. B poses. A forgets about C being AFK by then and just waits.
Subcase: A skips C and poses, then B poses, then A doesn't know yet C is back so A poses again then C does... is that a new order (A, C, B) or does it go back to the old one? ANARCHY.
A system could clear these things up if it just let you know when it's your turn, and all you need to do is inform it when you're going AFK or are back in the rotation.
Or people could just be reasonable and respond to poses naturally, without hogging the screen.
I hate almost everything about pose order, from the people who 'discourage' you from stepping out of it (and this absolutely does happen, and I've never seen it done in a welcoming or inclusive way), to the way it means people pose these bloated 3 to 4 paragraph poses, trying to address everything that's been done or said since their last 'turn' to pose.
It's mostly the latter that bugs me the most, as it kills any narrative immersion and also makes it take like twenty minutes for people to pose.