MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. Kestrel
    3. Best
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 5
    • Topics 12
    • Posts 540
    • Best 408
    • Controversial 2
    • Groups 4

    Best posts made by Kestrel

    • RE: Real World Peeves, Disgruntlement, and Irks.

      First World Problems, but I'm frustrated by how much I still like Joss Whedon and how much his creations have irrevocably influenced me despite ... everything.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: Health and Wealth and GrownUp Stuff

      @Lithium said in Health and Wealth and GrownUp Stuff:

      I am in shape, it's a perfectly valid shape.

      Also: Life is a terminal condition, nobody makes it out alive.

      Also also: Congratulations on getting in a more socially acceptable shape.

      Also also also: I need a pool, my knees can't take extended walking/running.

      shapes

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: Tyche Banned

      @mietze said in Tyche Banned:

      If someone ever creates a constructive only forum community for MUSH land, where civil discourse is enforced with moderation, I would happily participate. I do think that's a lot harder than a lot of people appreciate, which is why to my knowledge it hasn't happened yet, and when/if it does I hope people will be appreciative.

      I run a pro-intersectional MU* Discord server with these rules.

      It does not have a no politics or no religion rule because the personal is political and what most people consider political tends to vary based on how far ahead we are as a society; I prefer a no racist politics rule because anything else, including "no politics", only benefits those with privilege and silences those without.

      It's just a MU* server but I and most (if not all) participants in that server have been harassed too often based on our sexual/gender identities and more across the MU* community for it to be a topic we can simply ignore. The server was created as a direct response to predatory harassment occurring on a game I was playing with friends at the time, which staff dismissed and ignored.

      I may be biased but I happen to think it's one of the nicest places on the internet.

      If after reading the rules that interests anyone, message me.

      posted in Announcements
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: Heroic Sacrifice

      @arkandel said in Heroic Sacrifice:

      @kestrel said in Heroic Sacrifice:

      So the question becomes, as a game creator, how do you tackle this? How do you encourage your playerbase to step back a little from their need to play heroes? From their need to avoid obstacles, reject risks/stakes, and inhibit progression or complexity in a story?

      Start with rewarding failure. Not many games do this; in fact nearly none do.

      I quite like the idea that failure would reward you (literally experience, or something similar), but success would cost you. Winning would have to be earned, ideally through a consecutive series of sacrifices made not just by you, but by other players throughout the story.

      So for example that guy whose character was tragically killed in an important battle, their sacrifice paved the way to your success. In this way it becomes not just personal, but social, and cultivates a player culture where taking hits means you're helping the group, the story, and get kudos for doing so.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: Good TV

      @bobotron said in Good TV:

      Second best season premiere so far, after the Mountain Men introduction. 😄

      the 100

      Aww, look how cute Octavia looks in this gif. I bet that in her spare time she likes chasing butterflies or something.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: Tyche Banned

      @Pandora said in Tyche Banned:

      Don't act like I didn't cover that sort of situation in my post, it's disingenuous & that's only if I'm being generous about your intentions.

      Considering the specific context of the post you were responding to, ditto, brah.

      posted in Announcements
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: What Is Missing For You?

      @peasoupling said in What Is Missing For You?:

      The first things that come to mind are Westworld

      ftfy

      (I would play this.)

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: RL Anger

      @Quinn said in RL Anger:

      @kestrel How Jews Became White Folks by Karen Brodkin is a great read if you're interested in that subject.

      Oh my god there's an actual book about this.

      Thank you, added to the list.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: What Would it Take to Repair the Community?

      @Ghost said in What Would it Take to Repair the Community?:

      @Kestrel said in What Would it Take to Repair the Community?:

      I'm a person who's been paying attention to the discussion on both of these boards and over on @Ghost's Reddit thread

      Oh that's riiiiiiiiight I'd almost forgotten.

      After that thread was necro for 3 weeks or so Kestrel decided to "check in" and throw barbs on that because things must have been boring.

      Poke. Poke. Poke.

      That's what's going on here and I don't think it's constructive at all.

      Yeah I liked how you implied my throwaway troll comment makes me part of some secret cabal or that I've bullied you personally, even though literally the only conflict we've ever had on these boards was:

      1. When you decided to persistently attack the creators of the 100 MUSH and everyone posting their support for the game on their ad thread, even though to my knowledge you didn't even play it, over some ancient beef with how they ran their last game.
      2. When I advertised a pro-intersectional MU* community.
      3. When you wanted to cast doubt on Azazello being exactly who everyone says he is.

      Each of these conflicts being initiated by you, most of which I did not respond to.

      Bruh if these boards have a bullying problem, you are it.

      posted in Reviews and Debates
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: Let's talk about TS.

      @arkandel said in Let's talk about TS.:

      @kestrel said in Let's talk about TS.:

      In my experience I'm almost alone in this within the MU* community (or maybe alone in being honest about this?) but most of my RL partners have been fully aware of my text-hobby and would consider TS cheating.

      What you probably never want to do is be on the flipside of that.

      In the late 90s I had an IC relationship with someone's RL wife who was also playing on the MUD, and he was having TS as well... until his regular partner dumped his character. Things went poorly after that, and in fact it was one of the few instances of real drama I ever encountered. This was beyond my control, and it's even arguable communication wouldn't have helped as by the time anyone (including my own IC partner) was aware there was a problem it was too late to resolve it or salvage a lot of ongoing RP which ended up having to be basically scrapped.

      On every occasion when someone disrespected my request (e.g. attempted to initiate sexy stuff after I'd specifically said I wasn't cool with that), it was abundantly clear that they had serious mental health issues and that I should avoid engaging with them regardless, so I wasn't sorry to cut them loose.

      What I don't want to communicate is stuff that should be self-evident.

      For example there's no such thing as OOC exclusivity, jealousy, any of that. Basically if these things need to be explained then there really won't be a need for them to.

      Even my time (and not just for TS) is my own, within limits; sure, if I suddenly stop playing for two weeks I should let people know, but I don't want to explain myself about not logging on one night when I was tired or went to bed early.

      All of what you're describing here is something that should be on them, not you. That's what I'm tryna say.

      You didn't do anything wrong by e-banging someone's wife. She (and her husband) did something wrong by not communicating properly between themselves and declaring their own boundaries to you.

      As you say, communication probably wouldn't have helped — on your side. Because you already did your part; the problem was that they didn't do theirs.

      Because I respect my RL partners, I communicate to my RP partners upfront that I'm in a committed relationship IRL and don't want to do anything to jeopardise that, including TS. So I do my part.

      And that's all you can do: your part. It certainly helps to ask the other person where their comfort zone lies, but anything beyond that (e.g., them not being honest) isn't your concern.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: The 100: The Mush

      @surreality said in The 100: The Mush:

      @faraday Pretty much, yes. No one should be forced to play baseball if they only like basketball.

      They shouldn't, however, turn every game on the playground into a basketball game, or anyone not keen on playing basketball is apt to leave the playground, and rightly so.

      But this goes both ways.

      If I tell you that I'm an antagonistic player — or if you just look at my character wiki/+finger and you see a big red flashing neon sign that says, 'antagonistic character' in the form of roleplay hooks like 'edgy' and 'broody', please don't, as an avid basketball player / warm-fuzzy TSer, come over to my baseball pitch to accuse me of being a horrible person for not wanting to come play basketball. Which by the way, happens all the time.

      Basketball players and I have no beef. I might invite them over for a game or throw a baseball at them one time, and if they don't hit back, I'll shrug and go find someone else to play with. But I have encountered really entitled goody-type players who seem to get really offended by the fact that I don't want to change my character to cater to their fantasy. I come with a warning label, OK? Don't be the guy who orders a pizza from Dominos and then complains that the crust had gluten in it.

      tl;dr: Everyone needs to learn to just be more accepting and find their niche because no style is better than the other, it's all just preferences. Live and let live.

      Also, know what the theme of the game you're getting into is.

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: RL Anger

      Insurance companies trying to find excuses not to pay and just making it as difficult as possible for you to collect.

      alt text

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: The 100: The Mush

      @Coin said in The 100: The Mush:

      #sorrynotsorry

      That was a very insincere apology.

      @Coin is a jerk.

      Discuss.

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      Wow last episode was so fucking bad.

      And I legit don't think I've ever said a GoT episode was bad before, but ... 🤦🏼‍♀️

      ***=This feels like fanfiction.***

      click to show

      Did the writers just forget all of their characters' entire histories all of a sudden?

      I can't tell if some of the choices they made last episode were for the sake of pointless drama, because maybe somehow they think there isn't enough to hold viewers' interest in this world of magic and monsters and dragons that they need to add shitty sexist bitchfights or whatever, or if they have legitimately lost the plot. But I mean, with only two episodes left to go, it seems like they'd have need for every scene they can get to squeeze in all the last storylines ... so tf are they doing?

      1. OK let's start with this whole Sansa vs. Daenerys nonsense. Last season Sansa was a bonafide badass. She learned from all of her enemies, all of her mistakes, and finally grew into her own to rise above the schemers.
        This season she has turned into one. She's starting to act like Cersei, with this whole random unjustified hatred of Daenerys, which reminds me a lot of how Cersei treated Margaery. Cersei vs. Margaery made sense, though; Cersei has always been, in her own brother's words, "a hateful woman". The pettiness was part of her character from the start, in the books and show, and was never portrayed as something to be admired. Sansa should be better than that, though; she's outgrown her bratty "I want to marry a prince and wear pretty dresses" phase. I don't hate Sansa for this season's corruption of her character, however, because I don't think this is Sansa. It's out of character for her; it's just bad writing. It's like someone picked her up off the roster and started ruining her. I guess they felt like they just needed to pit these two boss bitches against each other to add some intrigue? They couldn't possibly support each other, look up to each other's success, and bond over their shared love of Jon? The only way this could be more insulting is if they were fighting over a man. It's just so stupid.

      2. Bronn. I didn't buy that scene with him at all. I laughed all the way through it because it was funny — Jerome Flynn is a terrific actor and has witty lines to work with. But in terms of story? It made no sense. He may be a cutthroat and a sellsword, but he's had real character growth and shared experiences bonding with the Lannister brothers. I don't buy for a second that he would so gladly take Cersei up on her offer. When Qyburn handed him the crossbow, I felt certain there was going to be more to the story than just Bronn shrugging, throwing seasons of character development out the window, and saying sure. I thought perhaps it'd end up in Arya/Sansa/Jaime's hands and be used to kill Cersei, or something equally poetic. Bronn may be a greedy SOB, and he may never have let on that he had more to him than that, but I always felt that his friendship with the Lannister boys, especially Tyrion, was genuine.

      3. Finally, Daenerys. This one annoys me more than the rest because it feels like a sad reflection of reality. The minute a woman becomes "too successful", in a story or in life, both the fanbase and now the show itself turn against her.
        Look, if you want to hate Dany for burning the Tarlys alive, we'll agree to disagree — I think her choice was fair — but I'll respect your opinion. She did do that so it's a valid reason to hate her. But this whole nonsense now with Varys worrying about her "state of mind", Sansa hating her for no reason ... ex-fucking-scuse me? And then, as is the case with Sansa and Bronn, it feels like the writers are forgetting the entire foundation of the character they're writing for.
        Daenerys is smart. She has repeatedly proven she has a good head for military strategy, and she masterminds brilliant, cunning plans that no one sees coming because they underestimate her. For example: when she burned the Khals in Vaes Dothrak; when she agreed to trade her dragon for an Unsullied army, against her advisors (rightful) pleas that this was a terrible idea, only to then reveal her play by having that dragon burn the buyer alive and instructing the slaves to kill the masters — revealing that she could speak Valyrian all along.
        So unless she's still lying to her advisors about her plans, which would make no sense as she has no reason to right now, I don't understand what she's doing in King's Landing right now. This choice completely flies in the face of all the choices she has made before, repeatedly refusing to compromise her ideals and finding better, cleverer ways to win wars with more strategic strikes against the deserving rather than the innocents.
        Her plan now is to ... "burn them all"? Really? That's not the Daenerys anyone has come to know and love. She has never been a brute force fighter. Even when she burned the Tarlys, she was killing two people who quite literally asked for it, after being offered a way out and stupidly refusing, to make everyone under their command surrender and then allowing them to leave unharmed.

      At this point none of the characters on the screen feel authentic any more and I feel like I may as well be watching bad fanfiction from someone who's writing for these characters because they like their aesthetic but doesn't actually know their background.

      WAIT. I FORGOT ONE.

      1. Jon. Jon would never actually give Ghost up. He has been a good boi since the day they met. That's a joke.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: The 100: The Mush

      I know the 100 MUSH is 100% over, but I just saw the Season 4 trailer and needed a place to share my excitement with other nerds who would understand.

      cue rabid screaming.

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      @Arkandel

      I like this theory.

      ***=Expounded thoughts on this possible ending.***

      click to show

      1. It would explain why Daenerys has suddenly become an idiot, considering she has prophetic dreams and may have been listening to her instincts.
      2. It would make an interesting and enjoyable twist to reveal that Fire (Daenerys) was the Big Bad all along, not Ice (the Night King) and it'd leave room for the Azor Ahai prophecy to still be fulfilled. NK's rather sudden and anticlimactic death would make a lot more sense in that context, considering the amount of build-up his villain arc has had — though I did enjoy Arya's badassery all the same.
      3. The Season 8 teaser did sort of spoil the season's trajectory to begin with, and I'd be surprised if Kings' Landing didn't go up in flames in some form.

      I've always thought the "Daenerys is Nyssa Nyssa" theory was idiotic, and would've been very disappointed if it'd turned out to be true — so I was glad it didn't. I'd like for her death to be somewhat more meaningful than "fridged by her loverboy in the most phallic of ways to save the world". Prophecy details here for the unfamiliar. Basically it was that in order to forge Lightbringer, Jon Snow, AKA Azor Ahai, would need to plunge his sword into her bewb, sacrificing her to defeat the Night King.

      If it turns out she was actually the villain all along, though, and he murders her because she goes full Mad Queen with an army of dragons at her back, I'm OK with that.

      I'll be honest, I was kind of hoping GoT would end with everyone dead due to Climate Change cough cough the Night King and if we get the same result just with Fire instead of Ice I'm equally OK with that.

      Side note, not a spoiler, I really enjoy Euron Greyjoy's actor. I feel sort of bad for him. He picked the wrong Queen. 😞

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • RE: Game of Thrones

      It's a real shame that the producers weren't able to finance the budget for an eighth season, but I'm glad the show ended on a high note with the season seven finale.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Kestrel
      Kestrel
    • 1
    • 2
    • 13
    • 14
    • 15
    • 16
    • 17
    • 20
    • 21
    • 15 / 21