I'm hesitant to enforce 'you have to be pretty' or 'you have to look like a Frankenstein' on any Seeming based on a first draft of a few Kiths. The Seeming write-ups that I've seen so far say your pattern is wrong. Fairest don't have to be pretty or elegant, just leaders (whether by choice, fate, or whatever). Beasts don't have to be wild, twigs-in-their-hair, mud-splattered people.. they just have to identify with an animal in some way. I would love to see the writeup for Wizened, but I'm going to bet that you don't have to be some lurching, terrifying amalgam of jury-rigged parts. For that one, even the Kiths aren't necessarily calling them 'patchwork', they're noting particular attributes as having mechanical components but a smoothly running machine is every bit as capable of being lovely and elegant as a Fairest. Ogres don't have to be hard-edged, rough-hewn brutes... but they -seem- much bigger than they are. That whole thing of someone swaggering around with an air of being ten feet tall and bulletproof comes to mind. They're noted as being tough more than rough, and capable of great violence (albeit not necessarily physically violent). They aren't delicate by any means, but I could see an Ogre being anything from a somewhat reptilian, scaled being with an acerbic tongue to leather-skinned cowboy sort (Jack Palance comes to mind), to a marble-hard, not-a-hair-out-of-place, stone cold bitch. Actually... thinking of it... Vera would have been amazing as a 2E Ogre (and I'm fairly certain that's something that's been remarked upon earlier).
TLDR; There seems to be a disconnect between the brief suggestions of appearances in Kiths and the more thorough suggestions in Seemings. I would hesitate to apply generalizations and stereotypes (especially ones that hearken back to 1E) to any of the Seemings in 2E.