MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. Roz
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 7
    • Followers 14
    • Topics 15
    • Posts 2073
    • Best 1307
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 3

    Posts made by Roz

    • RE: Regarding administration on MSB

      Hoo boy. A few things.

      First? There are some areas of the moderation reaction where I feel like people could ease up. There have definitely been some moments that felt like people were really eager to jump in aggressively at the slightest hint of misstep in a way that wasn't always constructive. I think there needs to be a space where we're able to respond to the natural missteps of growing pains as moderation is figured out with a little benefit of the doubt. But, like, I'm reminded a bit of when I was staff on Steel & Stone and we added a Chatter channel because we wanted to keep Public more game-focused and there was a high volume of chatter going on. Some people would get really offended at being asked to move, and they'd be super ready to point out if you didn't immediately ask someone else to move or something. Like. We're all human there.

      That said? There's been a lot of defensive doubling down even at perfectly mild responses to inconsistencies. Which is only going to encourage those people who are starting at mild and civil to ramp up to less mild and less civil. I think we as the posters need to avoid having an attitude of "you fucked up, please commence public flogging" so that the mods can also have an attitude of "oh we fucked up, let's just fix it, we're all learning and it's not the end of the world." Like. Yeah, that one thread probably shouldn't have been moved wholesale over to the Hog Pit. But there's just a certain level of vitriol about it that I find honestly weird. Like. Is it that people really think @Ganymede was doing this to spite and silence people? Idek! But both sides have to be willing to have a certain amount of chill that is just not existing. These missteps don't have to be a huge deal for the most part. We're talking about how and when to move threads.

      However. I will state that I don't think @Auspice has a good temperament for modding here. When the board was handed over to @Arkandel, I nodded and thought, "Yeah that makes sense." When he added @Ganymede as a mod, I nodded and thought, "Yeah that makes sense." When he added Auspice, I paused. This is not actually because I hate her as a poster or a player by any means. It's just that she tends towards a regular sort of defensiveness and temperament as a poster that I didn't feel was a great fit when she was announced as being on board, and I think that's kind of becoming clear.

      I do understand that her real intent in her response to @meg was "Hey, if people really want to start sharing RL stories about this back and forth, it might work best in a different thread." I also understand how it felt very much like "This isn't the place to share your RL story." Meg wasn't sharing a story just to share the story. She was sharing an experience to directly comment on the conversation happening in that thread. Frankly, it's no one else's business to say "You'll be more heard with this story if you make a new thread for it. It'll be lost in two months here." Maybe she doesn't want it to be something that lingers after those two months? Maybe she didn't want to make a thread focusing on her RL experience because she only wanted to talk about it in terms of how it related to that thread. And at the point when Auspice commented, there hadn't been a major derail of topic by any means. A couple folks basically said "yeah I've had those kinds of shitty experiences too," and that was it. When people reacted negatively to Auspice's comment, her reaction was to basically say "You're only reacting this way because it's coming from me." AKA thoroughly dismissing the idea that people could have felt negatively about what she said. And in this thread, her reaction was to say that people were literally too obtuse to understand if they had any sort of confusion. Which is just, flat out, not something you can say as a mod, just like it's not something you can say as a MU* staffer.

      The fact of the matter is that, as mods, you will never be able to post without some sort of mod voice. It will be seen as such whether or not you personally think you're posting JUST AS A POSTER, the same way people pay extra attention to when a staff alt on a public channel says something about knocking something off. It's the reality of moderating, just like it's the reality of staffing.

      I don't know how much it's really going to solve anything to start making new forum sections, but I'm very happy to be proven wrong here. But I don't see how having a reviews section will end up any different from what already happens on the ad threads.

      I think the bottom line for me is that the response a person has to messing up is vitally important. Right now, many of the responses to messing up from the mod team has actively exacerbated the conflict going on.

      That said, this is a terrible forum to have to mod for. 😛

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: Mira from Arx

      @admiral 0_1510258595974_Ignore.png

      posted in A Shout in the Dark
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: RL Anger

      Still struggling several months into my new job, and now my WORK WIFE IS LEAVING. ;________;

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: Book Recommendations

      I feel like GGK haunted my childhood in the best sense of the phrase.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: General Video Game Thread

      @thenomain said in General Video Game Thread:

      @roz said in General Video Game Thread:

      @sparks said in General Video Game Thread:

      @roz said in General Video Game Thread:

      DRAGON AGE 2 IS MY PERFECT BABY AND IT IS PERFECT

      holds up sign saying "REMEMBER THE CAVES"

      P E R F E C T

      Remember that plot in DA2 that wasn't about Merrill or Varric that was interesting? Yeah, me neither. Interesting aside: The woman who wrote for Merrill also wrote for Varric.

      Um yes? I do remember? I remember all the plots because DA2 had the best story and best characters of all the DA games?

      posted in Other Games
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: General Video Game Thread

      @sparks said in General Video Game Thread:

      @roz said in General Video Game Thread:

      DRAGON AGE 2 IS MY PERFECT BABY AND IT IS PERFECT

      holds up sign saying "REMEMBER THE CAVES"

      P E R F E C T

      posted in Other Games
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: General Video Game Thread

      DRAGON AGE 2 IS MY PERFECT BABY AND IT IS PERFECT

      posted in Other Games
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: Stranger Than Fiction MUX

      @karmageddon said in Stranger Than Fiction MUX:

      http://www.stfmush.com/sf/Basics

      Sex : Yup. You gotta pick one! For the mentally delayed players, pick between Male and Female.

      That blurb is so uncool on so many levels.

      Fucking yikes.

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: Random links

      @auspice said in Random links:

      For the board's lawyers:
      alt text

      stare at @saosmash and @Ganymede

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: RL things I love

      @arkandel Yeah, this is becoming illegal in a few places, and a lot of places have stuff in the works. I know MA and NYC have passed stuff making it illegal, although I don't recall if it's fully rolled out either of those places.

      FOR THE RECORD, I fully support colleagues sharing their salaries as they wish to help smash wage gaps!!

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: Character Information: Wiki or Mu*?

      @mietze I'm a huge huge wiki fan and will always be on the side of wikis, but, like -- are there really games where even basic info like someone's last name isn't included in a +finger or +sheet? That is dumb. Even I won't argue for that.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: RL things I love

      @auspice FOR THE RECORD, what you currently make is not the business of anyone but you and your employer. What you're looking to make is already the acceptable answer for that. 😉

      (I'm glad your mishearing worked out in your favor.)

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: X-Men Utopia MUX

      @surreality said in X-Men Utopia MUX:

      @ixokai Forms can make it easier. 'Fill in the blanks' on an actual web form is much easier even than filling out a template. It can help, anyway. There's autofill options and such, too.

      If I ever get off my ass about doing a thing again, I can share an example.

      The XF:NYC wiki is still up, so you can see some of our forms here. Just put in a name into one of the options and click through to see the input form. (It won't let you fill it out if you're not a user.)

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: Mac OS Sierra Client

      @rnmissionrun said in Mac OS Sierra Client:

      Atlantis is awesome sauce but Potato runs just fine on MacOS, if you prefer it.

      I mean, yes Atlantis is awesome, but:

      @girlcalledblu said in Mac OS Sierra Client:

      I did something dumb and upgraded my Mac OS to Sierra and now my Potato client doesn't work.

      So the point is that it doesn't run fine for the OP.

      posted in MU Questions & Requests
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: Atlantis Client: How to autolog

      Here you go!

      (@Sparks, you should put your forums back up sometime.)

      posted in MU Questions & Requests
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: Your Opinions of These Games

      @alzie There's a large number of posts about it in its own thread I think in the Hog Pit. Unlike @Sunny, I was not super impressed with Lux as a staffer. Not huge corruption issues or wildly dramatic things, but bad tonal issues and not great at receiving feedback on it. (I know folks who enjoyed him player-to-player on previous games, so he may just not be a great fit as a staffer.) Also stuff with him getting pretty protective over his favorites in the sphere.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: Make MSB great again!

      I mean, I wouldn't mind if the rule was actually "no reviews at all, positive or negative, in the ad thread" and it was relegated to just questions/clarifications. That way you could put any and all game feedback in a thread in Mildly Constructive or wherever, positive and negative, and avoid this sense of "all the positive things are reprinted next to it and the negative things relegated to somewhere else."

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: FCs on Comic MUs

      @sunny said in FCs on Comic MUs:

      @onigiri said in FCs on Comic MUs:

      I don't think I've seen gender swaps a lot, however, so much as creative interpretations of FC sexuality. Which is also always someone just wanting to bring out their particular fetish into the FC. I don't think I've ever seen that go over well. Ever.

      Wait, what?

      Yeah, uh, are we talking about "adding hardcore fetish interest to an FC" or are we having the argument "taking an FC who generally appears as straight in canon and exploring bisexuality on a MU* is about someone playing a fetish"? Because if it's the latter, that's gross to say, and also, I have seen it go over well plenty of times.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: FCs on Comic MUs

      @tnp Jesus Christ, this. Like, bisexuality is a thing that exists and it's a thing that plenty of people IRL discover and explore later in their life, it doesn't have to be an invalidation of previous canon relationships they had.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Roz
      Roz
    • RE: FCs on Comic MUs

      okay wtf is a potpourri game

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Roz
      Roz
    • 1
    • 2
    • 53
    • 54
    • 55
    • 56
    • 57
    • 103
    • 104
    • 55 / 104