@lithium said in RL Anger:
@Tyche Just because you didn't see it, doesn't mean it didn't fucking happen.
People are remarkably unreliable when it come to relating conversations they heard a year later let alone almost twenty years later. Posting it on the internet doesn't mean it happened either.
The thesis of the article in a nut shell:
"Trust me. It won’t work. High school already sucks. Believe me when I tell you that a massive uptick in security makes it worse."
The author would have had a strong point if there had been a shooting at his school after they "secured" the school. He actually bemoans that the school district had an "obscene median income" which allowed them to install security detectors/cameras, and hire armed guards. If it don't work, why is it that Sidwell Friends private school where all the elite in Washington send their children have far more elaborate systems of security and armed guards. Better the school district was poor and couldn't provide security? Sorry the article was way too long on feels and too short on logic.
People wore trench coats in high school depending on fashion and weather needs of the location.
Just because they didn't where you live(d) means /nothing/.
The point is that where and when they were popular does mean nothing. And if a school district determines it doesn't want kids to wear them for "reasons" then it's not the end of the world.