MU Soapbox

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Muxify
    • Mustard
    1. Home
    2. Arkandel
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 9
    • Topics 171
    • Posts 8075
    • Best 3388
    • Controversial 20
    • Groups 4

    Posts made by Arkandel

    • RE: RL Anger

      Also sometimes people simply mistake friendship for acquaintance or just what hanging out with someone grants them.

      I have had gaming or basketball buddies about whose lives I never knew much about. We'd get together sometimes even multiple hours in the week and be friendly but not friends. There's no fairweather factor present because it is (or ought, IMHO, to be) understood that it's just not at that level.

      There's always the friend who's a little bit crazy. They'll do whatever fucked up thing (that you may have advised them not to) and then expect support. Depending on the depth of that relationship such support might or not be given.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Windows 8 & 10 - Thread Updated

      @Miss-Demeanor said:

      Not you two, obviously, or even necessarily anyone on MSB... just in general)

      <bites his tongue until blood is drawn>

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Windows 8 & 10 - Thread Updated

      @HelloRaptor I'm as far from a Windows zealot as it gets. I make a living working on Linux. But a family friend is a self-proclaimed open source supporter and he spams Facebook constantly about the evils of Microsoft products; the things he posts sometimes... you know how sometimes you wish some people wouldn't be on the same side of an argument as yourself? That.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Windows 8 & 10 - Thread Updated

      @HelloRaptor The sky was never falling, I had very little doubt the last thing Microsoft wanted was piss off all those users for next to no gain for themselves. However it was still relevant to Windows 10. 🙂

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Seeking Women for Multi-Game Harem

      @Trundlebot said:

      I once mav'd a serious-rp set-pose into a pwp TS scene and felt strangely really embarrassed about it.

      What is pwp?

      (Ah, MSB, never stop teaching me new things)

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Seeking Women for Multi-Game Harem

      @TNP said:

      Strangely, no one claimed credit.

      Oh, totally unexpected. I am shocked really. 🙂

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Windows 8 & 10 - Thread Updated

      http://www.pcgamer.com/windows-10-can-disable-pirated-games/

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Seeking Women for Multi-Game Harem

      @surreality said:

      @tragedyjones If you'd asked for dick pics, I'm sure this would have been a very different story.

      Well, duh, these forums are full of dicks.

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Seeking Women for Multi-Game Harem

      A thousand years ago I was on this MUD where staff politics included having regular meetings. Regular multi-hour long meetings where we voted about everything. Since this was back in MU*'s golden days with a hundred and fifty unique logins or so we had something like twenty staff members in that room discussing things to great length. Paragraphs and paragraphs of arguments.

      It was boring as hell. So I was TSing with another staff member over pages (don't judge me! - okay, judge me, whatever).

      Did I mention how boring this was and how long it was taking? Because at some point she mischannels, and instead of paging me, she poses it. In a room full of staff, one of whom was her RL husband.

      All hell broke loose.

      Yeah, so. No mav I've ever seen since beats that, but I'm sure one of you freaks has a better tale to tell. 🙂

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: The State of the Chronicles of Darkness

      @Bobotron Good luck! The wishes of a thousand MSBers and WORAites are with you. With that kind of karma coming your way what can possibly go wrong?

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Seeking Women for Multi-Game Harem

      @Miss-Demeanor said:

      I'll volunteer! But only because TJ is like, totally hawt and offering teh sexxorz.

      He SAID no drama!

      <runs, fast>

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Magic: the Gathering

      So I did some research (MtG used to be one of my nerd-life's biggest obsessions) last night.

      For starters I consider Magic Duels superior to Hearthstone - its closest direct equivalent and rival - for a simple reason: It's far more affordable. Mathematically speaking if you buy (be it with in-game earnable gold or real life $$) 72 boosters on M:D you are done - you have all the cards unlocked at the cap, and you only need to do it again when new expansions hit every few months. With Hearthstone there are a lot less ways to keep up or, worse, catch up to other people who've been playing a while. Someone else did the math and a new player starting today is around $300 on average behind someone who started a year ago and has been doing dailies, with the gap only growing. Furthermore, on Hearthstone you need to find enough of each card that you want for decks - the expense is significant. Hearthstone does look damn good though, it's a very polished product (Blizzard is a little better at making video games than WotC, eh?).

      As for MTGO vs M:D, the former is of course the most robust product. It features the full card list for many, many expansions as opposed to 80% of each of a few recent ones and utilizes all of Magic's rules rather than a (slightly) simplified version. It, however, is a reflection of the paper game - you need to buy a lot more boosters than 72 to keep up, although of course being able to trade helps in focusing on some specific decks or colors. On the other hand it looks significantly worse and the cumulative complexity of supporting a decade+ worth of mechanics has cause more than a few technical issues and bugs. On the other hand MTGO does give players the ability to be part of sealed deck tournaments, participate in real ladder play, etc. So for competitive players it really is the only way to go.

      To me at the moment M:D looks like the superior game. It's slimmed down but it's manageable in terms of how much I'm willing to spend playing online. I mean I have 1400+ cards on MTGO from back in the day but almost none of them are Standard-legal any more, and I don't look forward to a huge investment just to start playing.

      I did install both Cockatrice and XMage yesterday. Both of these have a main advantage - since they're unofficial projects you get the whole database of every card and they are all free.

      Cockatrice looks good! It's very clear in what it does and the deck-building interface is pretty sleek but I didn't know anyone to try and play a couple of games to see how it handles itself. Basically it's a virtual table; you tap, keep track of life totals, make sure your deck is format-legal etc all on your own just like the paper game, so I read this sometimes causes complications with cards which have weird flip-over effects and whatnot.

      XMage is written in Java and looks... messy, at least to me. YMMV. It's supposed to be automated though, so cards actually do whatever they do like on MTGO/M:D. If I find an opponent tonight I'll make a deck there and give it a whirl.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Seeking Women for Multi-Game Harem

      @tragedyjones I'm pretty sure that's not how harems work. Source: I'm irresistible.

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Seeking Women for Multi-Game Harem

      @tragedyjones said:

      @Arkandel said:

      @tragedyjones said:

      Currently I am playing on Eldritch.

      Explain this.

      Playing is a strong term. I made a vampire PC recently. I won't get into issues about why I game--hopped in a thread about me seeing some titties.

      I can't think of a better place.

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Seeking Women for Multi-Game Harem

      @tragedyjones said:

      Currently I am playing on Eldritch.

      Explain this.

      posted in Adver-tis-ments
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Rewards in WoD

      See - and this might come down to a personal peeve of mine - what I dislike about the practice of exclusivity other than the obvious (there're many more players than cool mechanical effects) is that some people are simply more brazen than others. I don't mean that to be a negative thing, only to say that some players just are simply further naturally inclined to petition for "more" from staff than others.

      That has nothing to do with how well connected they are or if they are looking to twink; I openly admit to enjoying twinking, and am often pretty friendly with staff on the games I play but I'm also quite adverse when it comes to asking for more bang for my buck, so to speak, and I doubt I'm the only one who thinks like that.

      So when applying for the same thing - let's say a 5-dot Gadget - with the same mechanical goal in mind ('I want to punch harder') I might end up with a bonus ('+5 to punchery!') while shameless jerks like @HelloRaptor end up with something far better ('+5 to punchery and 50% chance for a knockout! and it projects a WHAP! sound balloon over the target's head!') simply because the rules for what's permitted are fuzzy and there aren't samples to go by and determine how much power each dot level represents. There are a few in the splat-books usually but the pool is tiny and MUSHes often interpret then set the bar differently.

      Since this is the only way people can get better returns for their investment in games - since powers are streamlined, if we both buy Protean 3 we get the same thing - custom content can be tricky to balance right.

      It only gets worse if people expect theirs to be exclusive because some of the nicer mechanics (reflexive healing, damage downgrade/upgrade, etc) really are few in number.

      posted in Mildly Constructive
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Magic: the Gathering

      So, a couple of hours spent on Duels yesterday. First of all some facts:

      It's got 251 Unique cards, 158 of which from the Origins paper set. After the first free deck building pack, you'll reportedly require something like 72 boosters to get everything, besides those gotten free through campaign and skill quests.

      Every new update should get 80% of any given paper set.

      Rarity restrictions still apply, maximum number of copies for each card are 4C, 3U, 2R, 1M.

      It has no trading, you get 5-15 coins per win (plus some from quests) and each booster costs 150 coins to buy. There's also a story mode which apparently yields some more card unlocks.

      I'm not sure I prefer it over MTGO - it's free but the paywall seems to hit pretty early on, especially without trading to let you specialize in a winning deck to use in the beginning. It's different than Magic, too, with its card restrictions and the concept of unlocking cards (rather than finding them in boosters one by one).

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Good TV

      @SG TSCC was one series I was so sure I'd hate when it first came out and I ended up loving it. It was #1 on my list of shows to watch the entire run, and it pissed me off to no end when it got cancelled.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Random links

      https://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-buzz/an-australian-professor-and-artist-doesnt-need-to-150511037.html

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • RE: Windows 8 & 10 - Thread Updated

      I don't know (*) if I'm risking @Thenomain's wrath but I dislike iTunes' interface.

      Edit: But I suspect I do.

      posted in Tastes Less Game'y
      Arkandel
      Arkandel
    • 1
    • 2
    • 357
    • 358
    • 359
    • 360
    • 361
    • 403
    • 404
    • 359 / 404