@Chet said in Wolfenstein MUSH?:
Well, if we have horror, sci-fi, and diesel, that could be a troll heavy environment.
Perhaps, we will need to apply the logic of Eric Cartman, Fuck It Mountain, the son of a wrestling team member.
We must adapt the comedy to the game, but as a series of three measures in discussion.
First, simulacrum: approach as diminuitive, to force the problem to show itself as a display of its strength, truly its weakness.
Then, the subversion, the movement to achieve dominance over the display of strength, by approaching with the inverse, the opposite concept in the abstract.
Finally, the counter, the defeat of the problem and the learned solution, the disabling of the displayed weakness with the inversion's conclusion form, our policy.
So, what is the weakness to a troll in terms of an Axis player (and there are more than three) that wants to be offensive, in their comedy. What can we find, if we force them to display this as their primary trait (with the proper courtesy of doing the same as Allies, a separate discussion), then applying the inversion of the logic to their consequence, for the policy solution, the gameplay factor in the theme?
Almost everything you said here went right over my head. Game idea doesn't appeal to me at all, though.
