@krmbm And I don't know most of 'em from Adam. See @reimesu 's example for what I'm worried about when I say:
Show me evidence, of a thing that happened, in a place that I control, and I will move hell and high water to keep you safe in that place. Because it's there. It's in black and white. There's the violation, there's the trust they broke, there it is.
But there is that other kind of predator out there, the one that whips people up with lies and ruins reputations because they enjoy using that tool to hurt people.
And the knee-jerk reaction of "Oh my god! You said they harmed you? I will nuke them immediately!" Caters to that sort.
@mietze I want to be clear that I will never shame anyone for giving out their info off game. I've given out my info off game, I've been harmed for it (and I've joyfully made new friends from it). I will however gently remind people that I can protect them to the best of my ability while they are in my virtual "house", but once they are in someone else's virtual "house" I lose my ability to do so. And in your example, they are doing stuff on game already and that's...stuff I will respond to. That's stuff you'll have a log for. A page log, a mail log, a channel log, a log log, you'll have it, and I can go "Wow, yeah, this is Not Okay, we will respond to this and thank you for bringing it to our attention."
But evidence is the standard I've chosen. Evidence, and acting within the scope of my power to act. I personally won't budge from it. Anyone can DNC anyone at any time for any reason, but if they want me to start getting happy with the ban hammer, I'm going to need something concrete to work with.