@surreality said in Looking for an Artist, actually willing to pay...:
Partly this is the whole 'customer inexperience' problem. "I paid $100 for this the last time when I got a similar thing from someone else, WTF you want $600?" If I heard one more time about how somebody's cousin would make it for less as an attempt to get me to drop a price -- and let's be real, they would never actually be asking the cousin to do it, it's almost always a request for the thing in hand right now at less than cost... it's one of those 'if I had a nickel every time' issues, I could retire now.
The entirety of what you're getting at seems to be "customer inexperience," which is a nice way of saying "customer idiocy" and/or "the usual American attitude of trying to get something for less than its value through force or fraud."
(By the way, I didn't make that up; an American economist pointed this out over 100 years ago, and it was as apt then as it is today.)
There is, or was, literally nothing wrong with looking to see if anyone would do work for less than time value, as far as I'm concerned. If I charged value for every niggling thing people asked me about the law, I'd be a lot richer and happier. As far as I'm concerned, if someone's willing to give up their skill and intellect for less than value, that's their choice.
And, in my opinion, artists, like lawyers, have the right to turn down business without being bullied or intimidated or shamed for sticking up for themselves, but choosing to do so doesn't give license to launching yourself at those who are willing to do things au gratis or for less than value. This is how business has worked since time in memoriam.
But if you're going to do something, do it right, do it well, and do it professionally, regardless of compensation. You choose fruit; you live with fruit.
But customers are fucking morons. I know this; you know this; we all know this.